Employer profile — to
Aramark Uniform Services
Federal OSHA safety record across 10 records in 8 states.
At a glance
Federal OSHA records for Aramark Uniform Services include 10 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 8 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.
By source
Severe Injury Reports — 10
Most recent 10 of 10 reports for this employer.
ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS —
Aramark Uniform Services
SKOKIE, ILLINOIS —
Aramark Uniform Services
COLUMBUS, OHIO —
Aramark Uniform Services
ORLANDO, FLORIDA —
Aramark Uniform Services
TWIN FALLS, IDAHO —
Aramark Uniform Services
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA —
Aramark Uniform Services
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS —
Aramark Uniform Services
DALLAS, TEXAS —
Aramark Uniform Services
MADISON, WISCONSIN —
Aramark Uniform Services
SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA —
Aramark Uniform Services
ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0
No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.
OSHA Inspections — 0
No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.
Recent OSHA citations
No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.
Locations on record
- BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
- 1 record
- ORLANDO, FLORIDA
- 1 record
- TWIN FALLS, IDAHO
- 1 record
- CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
- 1 record
- ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS
- 1 record
- SKOKIE, ILLINOIS
- 1 record
- COLUMBUS, OHIO
- 1 record
- SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
- 1 record
- DALLAS, TEXAS
- 1 record
- MADISON, WISCONSIN
- 1 record
Industries (NAICS codes seen)
- NAICS 448190
- —
- NAICS 454390
- —
- NAICS 722310
- —
- NAICS 81233
- —
- NAICS 812331
- —
- NAICS 812332
- —
Sources
This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.