Employer profile — to
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Federal OSHA safety record across 10 records in 6 states.
At a glance
Federal OSHA records for Georgia Pacific Corporation include 10 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 6 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.
By source
Severe Injury Reports — 10
Most recent 10 of 10 reports for this employer.
MILFORD, NEW JERSEY —
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
SHEBOYGAN, WISCONSIN —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
GURDON, ARKANSAS —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
CORRIGAN, TEXAS —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
AUGUSTA, GEORGIA —
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION
ROME, GEORGIA —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
ROME, GEORGIA —
Georgia Pacific Corporation
FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS —
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION
ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0
No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.
OSHA Inspections — 0
No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.
Recent OSHA citations
No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.
Locations on record
- ROME, GEORGIA
- 2 records
- FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS
- 1 record
- GURDON, ARKANSAS
- 1 record
- AUGUSTA, GEORGIA
- 1 record
- MILFORD, NEW JERSEY
- 1 record
- MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA
- 1 record
- CORRIGAN, TEXAS
- 1 record
- GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN
- 1 record
- SHEBOYGAN, WISCONSIN
- 1 record
Industries (NAICS codes seen)
- NAICS 321113
- —
- NAICS 321212
- —
- NAICS 321213
- —
- NAICS 322121
- —
- NAICS 322211
- —
- NAICS 322291
- —
- NAICS 423310
- —
Sources
This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.