Employer profile — to
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
Federal OSHA safety record across 9 records in 7 states.
At a glance
Federal OSHA records for Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC include 9 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 7 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.
By source
Severe Injury Reports — 9
Most recent 9 of 9 reports for this employer.
LEOMINSTER, MASSACHUSETTS —
Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
PENNINGTON, ALABAMA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
PALATKA, FLORIDA —
Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
PENNINGTON, ALABAMA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
RINCON, GEORGIA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
EASTON, PENNSYLVANIA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
ZACHARY, LOUISIANA —
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC
ZACHARY, LOUISIANA —
Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0
No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.
OSHA Inspections — 0
No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.
Recent OSHA citations
No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.
Locations on record
- PENNINGTON, ALABAMA
- 2 records
- ZACHARY, LOUISIANA
- 2 records
- PALATKA, FLORIDA
- 1 record
- RINCON, GEORGIA
- 1 record
- LEOMINSTER, MASSACHUSETTS
- 1 record
- MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA
- 1 record
- EASTON, PENNSYLVANIA
- 1 record
Industries (NAICS codes seen)
- NAICS 322110
- —
- NAICS 322121
- —
- NAICS 322211
- —
- NAICS 322291
- —
- NAICS 326199
- —
Sources
This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.