Minneapolis, MN —
OSHA Injury Report: Viking Materials
Injury · Other recordable case
At a glance
On , an injury at Viking Materials in Minneapolis, MN 55414 resulted in other recordable case. Employee was slitter Operator in metals service centers.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- Viking Materials
- Parent company
- Viking Materials
- Street
- 3225 Como Ave. S.E.
- City
- Minneapolis
- State
- MN
- ZIP
- 55414
- On-site location
- Railroad Tracks
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Other recordable case (code 4)
- Type
- Injury (code 1)
Before the incident
Climbing a railcar while doing the job of [REDACTED]
What happened
The EE was climbing a railcar to do the “[REDACTED]” job. Afterwards he realized that he had gotten a blister on the middle finger of his left hand. After [REDACTED] it started to become painful and stiff. On [REDACTED] he reported what happened to his supervisor but stated that he was going to wait to go to the clinic so he could see if it would get better on its own. Later in the evening on [REDACTED] he decided to go to Urgent Care to get it checked. The doctor determined that the area where the blister was had become infected. Then gave him antibiotics to help get rid of the infection.
Injury or illness
Blister on left middle finger that later became infected.
Object or substance involved
Climbing railcars.
Summary line
The EE got a blister on his left middle finger that ended up getting swollen and infected after a few days.
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Slitter Operator
- SOC code
- 51-9199 — Production Workers, All Other
- NAICS code
- 423510 — Metals service centers
- NAICS vintage
- 2012
- Avg employees
- 86
- Total hours worked
- 173310
- EIN
- 411226051
- Establishment ID
- 112956
- Employer case #
- 4
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 6:00
- Filing year
- 2025
- Submitted
- 14JAN26:21:36:00
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year 2025. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.