OSHA Injury Report: CHICAGO STMP

At a glance

Where did this happen?

What was the outcome?

Before the incident

EE states that he was working on the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] he had some soreness he thought is was due to not working this job in a long time.EE stated [REDACTED] his hands were worse and after work he saw that they were red and swollen EE stated he went to UC and made an appointment for treatment with PCP [REDACTED] because hands were so sore and bruised [REDACTED] DO MPH FACOEM [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

What happened

EE stated that he was using dominant hand to lift a stack of the small part LBW 1 - part grabbing the part through the cutout and putting it on the ledge to prep for loading the parts on to the conveyor - that he noticed the bruise on the left hand was an imprint of the pattern of holes on the part that he lifted with the left hand. That the bruising to the right hand was all around the edge of the palm. EE stated that the parts were individually light. That he lifted 7 plus of the small parts at time typically with his left dominant hand. EE stated that he was loading around 600 parts into welding per day. unverified to average number of parts done-day [REDACTED] DO MPH FACOEM [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

Injury or illness

Unspecified contact dermatitis unspecified cause-Hand-Bilateral

Object or substance involved

Metal parts - LBW and the quarter panels

Summary line

Unspecified contact dermatitis unspecified cause-Hand-Bilateral

Employee and industry

When (timing detail)

Source

Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year unspecified. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.