South Carolina, SC —
OSHA Injury Report: New Indy Catawba
Injury · Job transfer or restriction
At a glance
On , an injury at New Indy Catawba in South Carolina, SC 29704 resulted in job transfer or restriction. Employee was sixth Hand in paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing.
Where did this happen?
- Establishment
- New Indy Catawba
- Parent company
- New Indy Containerboard
- Street
- 5300 Cureton Ferry Rd
- City
- South Carolina
- State
- SC
- ZIP
- 29704
- On-site location
- PM 3 basement Press section First Unirun
What was the outcome?
- Outcome
- Job transfer or restriction (code 3)
- Type
- Injury (code 1)
- Days restricted or transferred
- 180
Before the incident
Guiding rope around capstan as it was being wound pulling felt through dryer
What happened
rope slipped while pulling dryer felt around with tugger. While rope was winding on tugger spool rope slipped and popped Dereks index finger on left hand. minor swelling as of now.
Injury or illness
Fracture of Hand Left Side
Object or substance involved
Tools Instruments and Equipment - Tools instruments and equipment unspecified
Summary line
Fracture of Hand Left Side - Directly harmed by: Tools Instruments and Equipment - Tools instruments and equipment unspecified
Employee and industry
- Job description
- Sixth Hand
- SOC code
- 51-9199 — Production Workers, All Other
- NAICS code
- 322130 — Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing
- NAICS vintage
- 2022
- Avg employees
- 409
- Total hours worked
- 1025547
- EIN
- 371694793
- Establishment ID
- 1211219
- Employer case #
- FY23-00100
When (timing detail)
- Date of incident
- Shift started
- 7:30:00.000
- Time of incident
- 17:38:00.000
- Submitted
- 01MAR24:22:45:00
Source
Data from OSHA ITA Form 300/301 electronic submissions, filing year unspecified. ITA Case Detail records are establishment-reported submissions, not OSHA inspections — no per-record IMIS deep link exists.