AURORA, NE —
OSHA Inspection: AURORA COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR CO.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of AURORA COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR CO. in 605 12TH ST., AURORA, NE 68818 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100054253.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AURORA COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR CO.
- Site address
- 605 12TH ST.
- City
- AURORA
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68818
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 209, AURORA, NE 68818
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5153
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of moving and shifting grain: causing an employee to be trapped under the grain: Establishment - grain bin #1. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develop and enforce a written confinedspace entry program. This program shall include, but is not limited to the following elements: 1) Specific procedures for the use of personal protective equipment, including a body harness with lifeline, 2) The provision for the use of personal protective equipment, including a body harness with lifelines, 3) Testing of the confined space atmosphere for safe oxygen content and/or toxic agents, and 4) The development of an entry permit system. k) housekeeping; grain dust accumulation throughout facilities, cleaning and frequency. i) welding and cutting operation; area safe before welding begins, inspection of area after, fire extinguishers - permit procedure. m) fire protection; location, type, condition of fire extinguishers. n) closing time inspection; before locking up for the night or weekend, a complete inspection of the facility should be made by an employee familiar with fire hazards in a mill or elevator.The inspection should include a specific path of travel, standard items to be inspected such as motors, drive belts, bearings, etc.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $175.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential injury from crushing caused by ascending and descending elevator cars and/or falling down unprotected elevator shafts: Elevator manlifts, ground floor - a guard or gate was not provided to keep employees from underneath the descending manlift. a) The gate on the manlift was not interlocked requiring the gate to be shut when the manlift was in operation. b) The gates on the second floor and bin floor were not interlocked to prevent the manlift from moving until the gates were closed. Feed mill manlift, ground floor - a guard or gate was not provided to keep employees from underneath the descending manlift. a) An interlock on the south door was not working, allowing the door to be open when the manlift was in operation. b) No gate was provided on the bin floor to guard the open shaftway. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to construct a barrier on the ground floor around the hoistways, so employees cannot be underneath the descending manlifts; and to install interlocks on the doors of the elevator manlifts and on the gates to prevent the manlift from moving before the gates are closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $175.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential injury from fire and/or explosions resulting from inadequate maintenance and inspection programs designed to eliminate ignition sources in grain dust atmosphere: Established - grain elevator. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develop and enforce a written maintenance and inspection program that list critical areas for maintenance and inspection of equipment. These areas include but are not limied to: a) bearing; lubrication, wear, loose bracket supports temperature. b) head and boot pulley; level, plumb, logging. c) leg belts; centered on head and boot pulley, belt tension. d) v-belts and pulleys; condition, alignment, tension. e) elevator legs; inspection opening for pulley logging, condition of belt, alignment of belt, bucket bolts secured, bucket alignment. f) motion detection devices; functional. g) tramp metal removal devices; clean and functional. h) dust control systems; clean and functional, lack of. i) static electricity removal devices; functional, bonded and grounded. j) electrical equipment; approved for hazardous location; grounding, temperature, condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $175.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $350
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
Recent events (4)
- — I $200.00
- — Z $700.00
- — I (S) $175.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $175.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1986
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 1986
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1986
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1986
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1986
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1986
More inspections at Aurora Cooperative Elevator CO.
View Aurora Cooperative Elevator CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100054253.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.