Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: JOHN MORRELL & COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOHN MORRELL & COMPANY in 1400 NORTH WEBER AVENUE, SIOUX FALLS, SD 57103 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100567346.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch John Morrell & Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for John Morrell & Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1400 NORTH WEBER AVENUE
City
SIOUX FALLS
State
SD
ZIP
57103
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2011
Employees
2325
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 08 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 1990
Abate by
Sep 16, 1991
Penalty
Initial $800 · Current $400 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a) Throughout the John Morrell & Company meatpacking plant located at
1400 Weber Avenue, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, employees engaged in
electrical service, repair, and installation operations were exposed
to the hazard of electrical shock and/or were exposing other workers
to the potential of electrical shock due to improper wiring, lack of
equipment grounding, lack of adequate isolation from live electrical
parts, and installing services that do not conform to local, state or
nationally recognized codes such as the National Electrical Code.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement would include, but not
be limited to, the following:
1) Four-year apprenticeship training under the direct supervision of
a journeyman level or master level electrician (at least 2000 hours/
year).
2) Following the apprenticeship period, journeyman candidates would be
required to take an successfully pass a journeyman's electrical
examination recommended by state or local electrical licensing boards
or the NEC.
3) Use work order permits to account for service work being performed
and to identify the personnel performing that work.
4) Use master electricians to conduct periodic inspections of electrical
service work as well as new installation work as a quality assurance
work.
5) Periodically evaluate the program and strickly enforce all of its
provisions.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $400.00
  • · Z (S) $800.00

5(a)(1)

Repeat Gravity 07 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 1990
Abate by
Sep 16, 1991
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a) On or about April 24, 1990, and at times prior to, at the John
Morrell & Company facility located at 1400 North Weber Avenue, Sioux
Falls, South Dakota, employees operating the G.A. Braun Model 400
washer/extractor machines were exposed to the hazard of severe burns
caused by contact with scalding water backflushed from the detergent
dispensing chute while the employees were pouring chemicals into the
dispenser.
Among othe methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to install commercially available automatic
chemical supply dispensing units.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (R) $3500.00
  • · Z (W) $7000.00

1910.212 A03 II

Repeat Gravity 08 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 1990
Abate by
Sep 16, 1991
Penalty
Initial $8,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (R) $4000.00
  • · Z (W) $8000.00

1910.242 A

Deleted Willful Gravity 09 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 1990
Abate by
Jul 9, 1990
Penalty
Initial $9,000 · Current $9,000
Recent events (2)
  • · J (W) $9000.00
  • · Z (W) $9000.00

View John Morrell & Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 100567346.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.