NAKNEK, AK —
OSHA Inspection: NORTH COAST SEAFOOD PROCESSORS INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NORTH COAST SEAFOOD PROCESSORS INC in M/V POLAR QUEEN, NAKNEK, AK 99633 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107106478.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NORTH COAST SEAFOOD PROCESSORS INC
- Site address
- M/V POLAR QUEEN
- City
- NAKNEK
- State
- AK
- ZIP
- 99633
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 70668, SEATTLE, WA 98107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 42
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Maritime safety.
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a recognized electrical shock or burns: (a)M/V Polar Queen: On the main deck, conductors were exposed on the fish pump switch. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to replace the pump switch. (b)M/V Polar Queen: In the engine room, two fluorescent lights fixtures less than 7 feet were not guarded to protect the tubes from accidental contact. One economical and feasible method of abatement would be to install approved tube guards. (c)M/V Polar Queen: In the freezer hold, an electrical junction box was missing a cover. This condition exposed employees to electrical shock or burns. Among other methods, one feasible and economical abatement to correct this hazard would be to replace a junction box cover. (d)M/V Polar Queen: In the freezer hold on the ceiling, a rectangle electrical wire box was missing the cover. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard is to replace the cover. (e)M/V Polar Queen: In the forward pump room, the main panel breaker had an unused opening. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock in the event of accidental contact while flipping switches at the panel box. Among other methods, one feasible and economical method to correct this hazard would be replace the missing circuit breaker. (f)M/V Polar Queen: In the machine shop, three 4 foot fluorescent light fixtures were missing bulbs and covers. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical burn or shock in the event of accidental contact. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to replace the tubes and install approved light guards. (g)M/V Polar Queen: In the forward pump room, one 4-inch round electrical junction box was missing a cover. This condition exposed employees to electrical shock or burn in the event of accidental contact with the conductors. Among other methods, one feasible and economical abatement to correct this hazard would be to replace the cover.
1910.106 G01 I
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 1997
1910.179 B05
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
1910.179 C01 I
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
1910.253 B02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Aug 18, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 1997
More inspections at North Coast Seafood Processors INC
View North Coast Seafood Processors INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in AK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107106478.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.