Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: YAK INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of YAK INC in M/V YARDARM KNOT-ST PAUL, ST. PAUL, AK 99660 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107293086.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch YAK INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for YAK INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
YAK INC
Site address
M/V YARDARM KNOT-ST PAUL
City
ST. PAUL
State
AK
ZIP
99660
Mailing
180 NICKERSON, SUITE 309, SEATTLE, WA 98109
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2092
Employees
176
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Maritime safety.

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
Apr 17, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,300 · Current $650 Reduced
The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar
or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting
from
an accident.
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a
recognized hazard of electrical shock or burns:
(a)   M/V Yardarm Knott:  Employees working and walking in the
chiller
flat room had occasion to be exposed to an electrical switch
that the ground bypassed by an extension cord.  This condition
exposed employees to possible shock and/or burns should they
become a source to ground.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of
abatement would be to install an electrical outlet within the
reach of the switch.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $650.00
  • — Z (S) $1300.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
Apr 13, 1993
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
recognized hazard of electrical shock:
(a)   M/V Yardarm Knott:  Employees in the chiller flat room had
occasion to walk and work near an exposed, unguarded electric
incandescent light bulb that was located at normal head
height.
This condition exposed employees to a possible broken bulb and
contact with live electrical conducts.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of
abatement would be to install/replace the guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
May 12, 1993
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a
recognized hazard of electrical shock or burns:
(a)   M/V Yardarm Knott:  Employees working in the line mechanic
room
had occasion to work with a hydraulic hose crimper that had
the
protective wafer missing on the plug-in.  This condition
exposed
employees to a shock and burn hazard.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method is to install a dead fronted plug-in.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.25 D01 X

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
Apr 13, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,300 · Current $650 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $650.00
  • — Z (S) $1300.00

1910.25 D02 VIII

Serious Gravity 00 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
Apr 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

5(a)(1)

Repeat Gravity 03 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
May 12, 1993
Penalty
Initial $10,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a
recognized hazard of personal injury of broken bones, lacerations, and
death.
(a)   M/V Yardarm Knot:  Employees were observed in the freezer
storage areas working around and near an elevator/hoist that
did
not have the bottom landing for the elevator hoist protected
or
guarded to prevent employees from placing themselves in a
position of danger under the elevator/hoist during the
descending operation of the elevator/hoist to the freezer
storage deck.  This condition exposed employees to personal
injuries of broken bones, lacerations and death should they
become trapped between the elevator/hoist and the deck
landing.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
install appropriate guarding around the front and sides of the
landing and insure employee compliance of keeping guards in
place during operation of the elevator/hoist.
Yard Arm Knott, Inc. was previously cited for a REPEAT
violation
of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its
equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection
Number 107107476, Citation Number 2, Item Number 5, issued on
September 27, 1990 and OSHA Inspection Number 107294340,
Citation Number 1, Item Number 4, issued on September 7, 1988.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (R) $4000.00
  • — Z (R) $10000.00

5(a)(1)

Repeat Gravity 03 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
Apr 17, 1993
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a
recognized hazard of electrical shock and burns:
(a)   M/V Yardarm Knott:  Employees working or walking in the main
engine room had occasion to be exposed to
uncovered/unprotected
electric panel bus bars in a panel box near a normal walkway.
This condition exposed employees to possible electrocution,
electric shock and/or electrical burns.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of
abatement would be to replace the panel covers and deadfront
the openings to the bus bar.
Yard Arm Knott, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of
this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent
standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number
107107476, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1, issued on
September
27, 1990.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (R) $2000.00
  • — Z (R) $4000.00

1910.212 A01

Repeat Gravity 01 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 9, 1993
Abate by
May 12, 1993
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — F (R) $2400.00
  • — Z (R) $6000.00

View YAK INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107293086.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.