GLOUCESTER CITY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: GEORGE CAMPBELL PAINTING CORP.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of GEORGE CAMPBELL PAINTING CORP. in WALT WHITMAN BRIDGE, GLOUCESTER CITY, NJ 08030 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107356370.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGE CAMPBELL PAINTING CORP.
- Site address
- WALT WHITMAN BRIDGE
- City
- GLOUCESTER CITY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08030
- Mailing
- 31-40 COLLEGE POINT BLVD., FLUSHING, NY 11354
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1721
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve %% similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident. 1a Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls from an elevation where the load imposed on the manila rope being used to suspend the scaffold exceeded the safe working load of the rope. a) N. J. side of the Walt Whitman Bridge, the 1st of nine two point suspended scaffolds on the West side of the Jersey Tower and North side of the bridge roadway. The scaffold was occupied by two employees engaged in blasting/painting operations on the bridge's main suspension cable. The scaffold was approximately 365 feet above the adjacent ground/ water level. Among other methods one feasible and acceptable method to correct the hazard is to place the scaffold platform on a safe surface.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazasrds that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall(s) from an elevation of approximately 365 feet. Support wire rope did not employ a thimble nor was the eye of the wire rope secured by "J" clamps properly torqued. a) Walt Whitman Bridge, New Jersey side of the bridge West side of the New Jersey Tower, north side of bridge. Scaffoldings occupied by employees that were supported by wire ropes reeved through Sky Climber hoists and then looped around the bridges main support cable and fashioned into an eye and secured to itself. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct the hazard would be to secure the wire rope to a choker that would be looped around the main suspension cable. The eye formed in the wire rope would then be fitted with a thimble and the eye on the wire rope would be secured by a "J" clamp properly installed and torqued as per manufacturer's recommendations. For assistance refer to: Sky Climber Operating Manual and the Rigging Manual compiled by the Construction Safety Association of Ontario.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall(s) from an elevation. The hoist on the west side of the scaffold nearest the Philadelphia side of the bridge was supporting a load that exceeded its" rated working load (RWL). a) New Jersey side of the Walt Whitman Bridge, the first of nine two point suspended scaffolds on the West Side of the New Jersey Tower and the North Side of the bridge roadway. The scaffold was occupied by two employees engaged in blasting and painting operations on teh bridge's main support cable. The scaffold was approximately 365' above ground level. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is by lessening the load imposed on the hoist and/or to evenly distribute the load between the two supporting hoists. For assistance refer to: 1) Sky Climber Manual 2) SIA pamphlet.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall(s) from an elevation while scaffold was being transferred along the main cable while being suspended in air rather than being placed on a safe surface before making the move(s). a) N. J. side of the Walt Whitman Bridge, the first of nine two point suspended scaffolds located between bents number 68 and 50 on the West Side of the Jesey Tower and the North Side of the bridge roadway. The scaffold was being used by employees engaged in blasting/ painting operations on the bridge's main suspension cable approximately 367 feet above the adjacent ground/water level. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct the hazard is to lower the scaffold(s) to the bridge roadway when performing transfer operations. For assistance refer to Sky Climber, Inc. Instruction Manual Model 4 Hoist Section 1.8.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1926.451 A03
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $7,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 1, 1993
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $500.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1993
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls from an elevation. The work was being conducted from scaffold(s) where the load imposed on the scaffold(s) exceeded the rated load of the scaffold platform(s). a) N.J. side of the Walt Whitman Bridge, nine two point suspended scaffolds on the west side of the Jersey Tower and north side of the bridge roadway. The scaffold was occupied by employee(s) engaged in blasting/painting operations on the bridge's main suspension cable. The scaffold(s) were between 190 to 367 feet above the adjacent ground/water level. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct the hazard is to reduce the load on the scaffold(s) to at or below the rated load of the scaffold platform(s) in use at the site or to utilize scaffold platform(s) with a rated load that exceeds the load(s) being applied to the scaffold(s). For assistance refer to Sky Climbers Instruction manual Section 1-2-9 or to pamphlet entitled Guidelines for Safe Practices for suspended powered scaffolds, Section E, Item 2 issued by the Scaffold Industry Assn. The company could also follow the Loading Instructions contained in the scaffold platform(s) manufacturer's specifications.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1993
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls from an elevation. The scaffold(s) were between 190 to 367 feet above the adjacent ground/water level and the scaffold(s) was/were being raised and lowered by the traction hoisting machines that were being operated without secondary emergency brakes designed to act directly on the suspension cables and are intended to automatically prevent the decent of the hoist and its suspended load under overspeed conditions. a) N.J. side of the Walt Whitman Bridge, nine 2 point suspension scaffolds located between bents numbers 68 and 50 on the West Side of the Jersey Tower and the north side of the bridge roadway. The scaffolds were operated by employees engaged in blasting/painting operations on on the bridge's main suspension cable. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct the hazard is to install Sky Lock Overspeed Brake Safety Devices on each of the eighteen (18) Sky Climber Hoisting Machines being used at the site. For assistance refer to Sky Climber, Inc. Instruction Manual Model 4 Hoist Sections 2.1, 2:3, 3.1, 3.5 and 5.4.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $5000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
More inspections at George Campbell Painting Corp.
View George Campbell Painting Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107356370.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.