FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: WATSON, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WATSON, INC. in 4015 S FREEWAY, FORT WORTH, TX 76110 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 108923319.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WATSON, INC.
- Site address
- 4015 S FREEWAY
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76110
- Mailing
- POST OFFICE BOX 11006, FORT WORTH, TX 76110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3532
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
H130
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of %% 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a.Painter was exposed to the hazards of skin and respiratory allergic sensitization which are associated with excessive levels of 1,6-Hexamethylene diisocyanate homopolymer, a HDI polyisocyanate, in a spray painting operation. Employee was exposed to HDI polyisocyanates at short term intervals which exceeded the recommended guideline for a 15 minute short term exposure limit (STEL) established as 1.0 mg/m3. These exposures were derived from 4 of 8 samples collected over an 125 minute period. Employee was exposed to STEL levels of 4.1 mg/m3 over a 16 minute period, 3.1 mg/m3 over a 19 minute period, 5.6 mg/m3 over a 15 minute period, and 1.4 mg/m3 over a 13 minute period. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing or eliminating this hazard, among other methods are: 1.Substitution with paint systems which do not contain diisocyanates. 2.Design and build a paint spray booth/room. 3.Modify the existing area to increase ventilation. Investigate the possibility of lowering the existing fan along the southeast wall and add an additional fan along the northeast wall. This might require adding a new exit door on the north wall of the spray area. Consideration should be given to ignition sources at the point of exhaust if the fans are lowered. Installation of a false ceiling above the track of the overhead crane could also reduce the volume of air to evacuate and result in increased air flow. If this approach is taken, consideration should be given to installing partitions to isolate any light fixtures in the false ceiling and the overhead crane should be moved out of the area during painting activities. 3.Use of a different paint application system to reduce the amount of overspray generated. Abatement Schedule Step 1 - Effective respiratory protection shall be provided by 09/29/94 and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits. Step 2 - A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director by 10/28/94 outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation: (1)Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; (2)Selection of optimum control method and completion of design; (3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; (4)Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. 30-day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 3 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls. Verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance shall be submitted by 11/29/94.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $525.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.134 A02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 1994
H130
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.134 E05 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
H130
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.28 A01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $700
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.94 A05 IIIB
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $525.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.107 C02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.107 C03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.107 G03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $420.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $525.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $315.00
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.1000 B02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $525.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.28 A01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 1994
1910.107 D02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 1994
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1994
More inspections at Watson, INC.
View Watson, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 108923319.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.