KITTANNING, PA —
OSHA Inspection: VISTA METALS INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VISTA METALS INCORPORATED in RD #4, KITTANNING, PA 16201 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116044785.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VISTA METALS INCORPORATED
- Site address
- RD #4
- City
- KITTANNING
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3399
- Employees
- 101
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of repetitive lifting and other strenous operations. This exposure caused aggravated or precipitated employee injuries to the trunk and upper extremities. The exposure occurred at the following operation: a) Drying Area: Employees transferring cans of cobalt/nickle metal powder from scale to OK'd Material Area. Employees lift 90 lb cans repetively from 10 inches to 24 inches in height. The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1990, 1991, documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. (1/08/92) b) Crushing Area: Employee lifts cans of rework material (weights varied from about 60-80 lbs) from pallets to crusher machine. Employee lifts from 8 inches to 25 inches to opening of crusher. The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1990, 1991, documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. (1/08/92) c) OK'd Material Area: Employees responsible to stack 90 lb cans of cobalt/nickle metal powder on to pellets for shipping. Employees lift 90 lbs cans from 6 inches to 25 inches. The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The injury and illness records for 1990, 1991, documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. (11/08/91) Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1. Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing manual lifting hazards in the workplace. this analy- sis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged through a mechanism such as a safety committee. 2. Medical management which includes accurate record- keeping of manual lifting injuries. The program should address recognition, evaluation, treatment, and referral of lifting cases. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3. Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of manual material handling, and how to prevent lifting injuries. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of manual lifting hazards, and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4. Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices and administrative controls. a) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to manual lifting hazards. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, multiple person lifts, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. b) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, proper placement of loads, and reduction of weight lifted. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: I Management Commitment Implement an ergonomics program. Ensure that the program includes a clear statement of managements commitment to effectively deal with the problem of employee injuries related to material handling and other strenuous activities. Ensure that the program is written; addresses the area of employee involvement; and provides a mandatory mechanism for regular program review and evaluation. II Reduce the weight per can to 25 lbs from 90 lbs or alternatively Utilize mechanical hoist III Initial comprehensive training program concerning material handling including advantages and disadvantages of lifting devices, practice and discussion of lifting techniques. IV Refresher training be provided that includes practice and discussion of proper material handling.
Recent events (4)
- — I
- — Z $8000.00
- — I (S) $630.00
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $630 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $630.00
- — Z (S) $1300.00
1910.1000 F02 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 1992
1910.134 B01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $1300.00
1910.134 B09
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 1992
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 18, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1992
More inspections at Vista Metals Incorporated
View Vista Metals Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116044785.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.