DAYTON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: DAYTON STEEL SERVICE INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAYTON STEEL SERVICE INC. in 3911 DAYTON PARK DRIVE, DAYTON, OH 45414 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 121983563.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAYTON STEEL SERVICE INC.
- Site address
- 3911 DAYTON PARK DRIVE
- City
- DAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45414
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7389
- Employees
- 34
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck or crushed by falling steel coils: (a) The "C" hook used in conjunction with the Schuette 25 ton crane had severe wear at the clevis where it attached to the crane hook and was being used to lift steel coils weighing up to or in excess of 46,000 pounds. In addition to the existing damage, the following requirements were not met to ensure that employees were not exposed to failure or overloading of special lifting devices: oThere was no determination made as to the rated load capacity of the "C hook and the capacity was not marked on the main structure so as to be visible to the crane operator and the unit was not proof tested. oA nameplate or other permanent marking including at least (1) the manufacturer's name and address (or equivalent), (2) the serial number, (3) the weight of the unit and (4) its rated load was not displayed on the "C" hook. oFrequent inspections were not conducted to detect deficiencies such as structural deformation, cracks or excessive wear on the "C" hook, so as to make a determination as to whether the conditions constituted a safety hazard. oPeriodic inspections were not conducted for the "C" hook to detect conditions such as but not limited to excessive wear at the load supporting clevis. Among other methods, one feasible abatement method is to ensure that the provisions of ANSI/ASME (American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers) B30.20 safety standard for "Below the Hook Lifting Devices" or equivalent are met prior to the use of any existing, new or repaired "C" hook or other special load attachment device.ent
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $4500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a) Employees attaching or detaching the 24" filler saddles on the recoiler for the Delta Slitter were subject to being struck or crushed by shifting or falling saddle(s) weighing approximately 200 pounds each due to the fact that the threads inside some of the bolt holes were stripped, resulting in fewer bolts holding the saddle(s) in place than is required by the manufacturer. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable means for abating this condition include repairing and retapping the bolt holes to bring them into compliance with manufacturer's specifications; implementing a preventative maintenance program which complies with the manufacturer's specifications; and implementing a training program for operators and helpers which enables them to (1) recognize potential hazards associated with attaching and when to remove saddles from service and report problems, (2) ensure that bolts are not over-torqued, and (3) ensure that bolts are properly and completely removed before the crane is used to pull the saddle.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2250.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1800.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1800.00
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2250.00
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1800.00
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1350.00
1910.179 I
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1350.00
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2250.00
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.179 L03 III
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2250.00
1910.179 N01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $4500.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $2,000
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $1800.00
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.184 E09 I
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $2250.00
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 1998
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1998
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1998
More inspections at Dayton Steel Service INC.
View Dayton Steel Service INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 121983563.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.