KEWANEE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP in 2006 KENTVILLE ROAD, KEWANEE, IL 61443 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 122198997.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP
- Site address
- 2006 KENTVILLE ROAD
- City
- KEWANEE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61443
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3715
- Employees
- 702
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2000
- Abate by
- May 4, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were required to perform tasks involving ergonomic risk factors (vibration, force, repetitive motion and awkward postures) resulting in stressors that had caused, or were likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). (a)On or about 8-30-00 and 8-31-00 riveting, drilling, squeezer area, front and rear trailer assembly, setting of floors screws and the use of impact guns were observed. The evaluation of these tasks indicated employees were exposed to hazards which caused or was likely to cause MSDs in that employees were required to perform these tasks. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The employer has implemented some controls in a few areas, such as counter balanced two button squeezers in Department H908 and H909. In addition, two hydraulic man lifts were purchased for the Ups Department. Employees noted that these changes had a positive impact on the health and safety of their jobs. However, the injury and illness records for 1998, 1999, and 2000 documented a pattern of MSDs. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of the following four elements: (1)Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing ergonomic risk factors in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the workplace shall be conducted at appropriate intervals to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the process should be encouraged. (2)Medical management which includes accurate record keeping of MSDs. The protocol should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of MSD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included. (3)Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness ofthe training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of manual material handling, and how to prevent the lifting injuries. Training should also be provided to management. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of risk factors. The training program should include the establishment's health care providers to ensure thatthey are able to recognize and prescribe appropriate treatment for MSDs. Educational material or training on ergonomics should be provided to people responsible for designing jobs and buying equipment, tools, workstations and parts. (4)Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, administrative, and work practice controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. (a)Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include workstation redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: Design the triggers on tools to minimize ergonomics risk factors such as awkward postures, force, repetition, contact stress and exposure to vibration. Establish a maintenance protocol for all tools and manual material handling equipment, such as the hydraulic squeezer and rollers, so that risk factors are minimized. Utilize the smaller/shorter rivet guns which the employees have reported produce less vibration and greater ease of use. Design rivet guns so that less force is required to hold the guns. Torque arms may be used to help the employee hold the tool in position so that they do not need to apply as much grip force. Redesign the bucking bar so that the surface area is large enough for employees to use it with less force. The newer bar has been reported to reduce vibration, but it may be more difficult to use due to its size.Utilize antifatigue mats where employees must stand on concrete surfaces (floor screw machine area where impact gun is used). Reduce the use of older drills, which are more difficult to use due to their weight and size. Evaluate different sized handles and different vibration dampening materials in a way that allows employees to provide feedback on which controls are most effective. These controls may be more effective that gloves. Reduce the time that employees must squeeze or hold parts and triggers. (b)Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventive maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. (c)Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Step 1 -Implementation of worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3 above. Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the engineering, administrative, and work practice controls as detailed in items 4(a)-4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MSDs. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 - Implementation of engineering, administrative, and work practice controls, as described in items 4(a)-4(c).
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $2000.00
- — I (S) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O) $1500.00
More inspections at Great Dane LTD. Partnership
View Great Dane LTD. Partnership's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 122198997.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.