CORAOPOLIS, PA —
OSHA Inspection: RHINO CONSTRUCTION INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of RHINO CONSTRUCTION INC. in 911 AIRLIFT GROUP/LGC, PGH. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CORAOPOLIS, PA 15108 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 122673825.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RHINO CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 911 AIRLIFT GROUP/LGC, PGH. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
- City
- CORAOPOLIS
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15108
- Mailing
- 720 GREENSBURG ROAD, LOWER BURRELL, PA 15068
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1542
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 1996
- Abate by
- May 6, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $21,000 · Current $21,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to asphyxiation/toxic atmosphere hazards in a confined space: (a) 911th TAC Airlift Group/SEG, Pittsburgh International Airport, Coraopolis, PA., Manhole #34 on 11/08/95: The following procedures were not implemented by the employer for entering and working in sanitary sewers: (1)The employer did not designate the workplace at manhole #34 on 11/08/95 as a permit required confined space. (2)The employer did not implement measures to prevent unauthorized entry into the confined space. (3)The employer did not complete a confined space entry permit prior to employee entry on 11/08/95. (4)The employer did not conduct atmospheric testing for oxygen, combustible gas/vapors including methane, and hydrogen sulfide in the confined space prior to employeeentry on 11/08/95. (5)The employer did not utilize ventilation equipment to ensure a safe atmosphere prior to entry and while work was in progress. (6)The employer did not make proper arrangements with the local rescue company to facilitate emergency procedures if necessary at the confined space. A reasonable and effective method to abate this hazard, among others, would be: 1.)Utilize the confined space entry procedures provided to the contractor by the U.S. Air Force base safety personnel.
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $21000.00
- — Z (W) $21000.00
1926.21 B06 I
- Issued
- May 2, 1996
- Abate by
- May 10, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $21,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $3500.00
- — Z (W) $21000.00
1926.50 E
- Issued
- May 2, 1996
- Abate by
- May 10, 1996
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1926.403 E
- Issued
- May 2, 1996
- Abate by
- May 20, 1996
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Rhino Construction INC.
View Rhino Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 122673825.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.