BISMARCK, ND —
OSHA Inspection: INGERSOLL RAND - BOBCAT
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of INGERSOLL RAND - BOBCAT in 536 26TH STREET SOUTH, BISMARCK, ND 58504 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300243086.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Ingersoll Rand - Bobcat — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ingersoll Rand - Bobcat is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INGERSOLL RAND - BOBCAT
- Site address
- 536 26TH STREET SOUTH
- City
- BISMARCK
- State
- ND
- ZIP
- 58504
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1215, BISMARCK, ND 58502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3531
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $1,125
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards associated with unstable storage racks: (a) Storage racks located in the new assembly area, east of vertical support #19 were not secured by bolting to the floor. (b) Storage racks located in the old assembly area, west of vertical support #20 were not secured by bolting to the floor. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1125.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.37 F06
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.184 I09 III
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $1,125
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1125.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.217 D06 III
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2000
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $12,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by or crushed by falling objects associated with collapse or failure of storage racks: (a) Materials were allowed to be placed on storage racks located outdoors, north of the "north shop" area, without determining the weight of the material and the rated load capacity of the racks. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable means of abatement includes the employer developing a method of determining the weight capacity of the racks as well as a method of determining the weight of materials being placed on the racks to ensure the holding capacity of the rack is not exceeded. Note: This company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in the following inspection, #300242591 dated June 8, 2000. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $12500.00
- — Z (R) $12500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by or crushed by falling objects associated with collapse or failure of storage racks: (a) A damaged leg on the storage rack located in building number ten used for storage of press dies was compromising the structural integrity of the rack. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable means of abatement includes the employer developing a method of storage rack inspection and removal from service of any storage racks found to be damaged. Note: This company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in the following inspection, #300242591, dated June 8, 2000. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.176 A
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $1500.00
- — Z (R) $1500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $25,000 · Current $25,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $25000.00
- — Z (R) $25000.00
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.255 B05
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2000
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2001
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Ingersoll Rand - Bobcat
Mar 20, 2007
BISMARCK, ND
Feb 15, 2006
BISMARCK, ND
Oct 14, 2005
BISMARCK, ND
May 23, 2002
BISMARCK, ND
May 7, 2002
BISMARCK, ND
View Ingersoll Rand - Bobcat's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
Jan 5, 2012
Bruce D. Bowman · SCHENECTADY, NY
Jan 25, 2005
KGC, INC. · BILLINGS, MT
Dec 31, 2002
Rockaway Borough DPW · ROCKAWAY, NJ
Dec 31, 2002
Harry Brickey DBA a. Brickey Ceiling Company · FOREST CITY, NC
Dec 31, 2002
Sudden Bond Industries · EDGERTON, KS
More inspections in ND
Jul 10, 2026
Robert R Schroeder Construction INC · TOLNA, ND
Jul 10, 2026
Sirel Duplessis Farm · DEVILS LAKE, ND
Jul 9, 2026
Nored, INC. · BEACH, ND
Jul 8, 2026
Nored, INC. · BOWMAN, ND
Jul 8, 2026
Nored, INC. · ELGIN, ND
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300243086.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.