TURNER, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC
Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC in PLAINS ROAD, TURNER, ME 04282 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300304987.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC
- Site address
- PLAINS ROAD
- City
- TURNER
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04282
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 219, 220, TURNER, ME 04282
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0252
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to injuries caused by being struck by the operation of defective manure trucks and components: Barn 9 and Barn 2 - The rear directional and back-up lights on truck 315 were not operational. Two mounting straps on the driver and passenger side fuel tanks were broken on truck 321. The side wall on the dump body of truck 321 was severely corroded and in danger of collapse. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to replace and repair defective parts and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $999.98
- — Z (S) $2000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to biological hazards including salmonella through hand contact: Barn 9 - An employee was removing dead chickens with gloves that were ripped and torn. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide gloves that are durable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1928.57 C05 IA
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $7,500 · Current $3,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to internal injuries, fractures, or death from possible collapse of elevated catwalks, roofs, and structures: In the following instances structures were not adequately supported or guyed: a)Feed Mill - Most of the wire-rope clamps on the guy wires of the catwalk towers were installed improperly and in insufficient numbers. b)Feed Mill - The guy wire splice adjacent to the truck bay contained wire-rope clamps that were not designed for joining wire-ropes. c)Feed Mill - The anchor adjacent to the truck bay contained cracked concrete. d)Feed Mill - The guy wires throughout the facility were not properly tensioned or torqued. e)Poland Incinerator Building - The roof rafter adjacent to the smoke pipe was defective due to fire and heat exposure. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install the proper hardware and framing members. Your company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 300298718, Citation Number 1, Item Number 2, issued on May 28, 1999.d
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $3750.00
- — Z (R) $7500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $15,000 · Current $6,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burns, electrical shock, and smoke inhalation from fires, electrical contact, and explosion due to the use of unapproved electrical equipment: In the following instances electrical equipment was not operated or maintained in a safe condition: a)Barn 2 - The electrical conduit for the auger drive motor was broken. b)Barn 71 and 72 Aisle - The constant fan control switch contained 230 volts, and a red conductor was spliced to a white conductor without the proper identification. The constant fan control switch was rated for 115 volts. c)Poland Incinerator Building - The #1 fuse contact was outfitted with a screw which bypassed the over-current protection or fuse. d)Poland Barn 1 - The pump switch was not provided with strain relief. e)Poland Barn 1 - The conductors for the two feed motors at the barn entrance were not provided with strain relief. f)Montville Boiler Room - The black outlet that was rated for 15 amps was connected to a 30 amp circuit. The outlet was not provided with a ground wire. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install approved gaskets, covers, hangers, conductors, switches, and fittings. Your company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 300298718, Citation Number 2, Item number 1, issued on May 28, 1999.d
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $6500.00
- — Z (R) $15000.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $6,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $6250.00
- — Z (R) $12500.00
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2000
Recent events (2)
- — I (R)
- — Z (R)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2000
Recent events (2)
- — I (R)
- — Z (R)
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 8, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $15,000 · Current $7,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $7500.00
- — Z (R) $15000.00
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2000
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
More inspections at Maine Contract Farming, LLC
View Maine Contract Farming, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300304987.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.