AKUTAN, AK —
OSHA Inspection: TRIDENT SEAFOODS CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRIDENT SEAFOODS CORPORATION in M/V INDEPENDENCE-AKUTAN, AKUTAN, AK 99553 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 301494522.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRIDENT SEAFOODS CORPORATION
- Site address
- M/V INDEPENDENCE-AKUTAN
- City
- AKUTAN
- State
- AK
- ZIP
- 99553
- Mailing
- 5011 JEWEL LAKE ROAD #203, ANCHORAGE, AK 99502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Maritime safety.
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to electrical burns or electrocution where the potential use of an ungrounded or defective power tool or appliance could occur: The following conditions contributed to the existence of this hazard: (a)M/V Independence: In the AFT/FWD boiler room where an employee had used an extension cord in the process of his work, the employer failed to ensure that appropriate removal of the extension cord was conducted upon completion of the work. The cord was still connected to the outlet and the female end of the cord was laying in water which created a short in the circuitry and subjected employees to the hazard of electrical burns or electrocution. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to disconnect, remove and properly store the extension cord after each use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of electrical shock, burns and or electrocution while using a defectively wired receptacle as a power source for electrical tools/appliances: (a)M/V Independence, engineers tool room: An electrical outlet, mounted on an overhead beam and on the bulkhead, was improperly wired and indicated reverse polarity when tested. Note: One feasible method, among others, is to reconnect the wiring to the appropriate terminals and test the outlet for correct reading before use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850.00
- — Z (S) $1700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of electric shock, burn or electrocution where the use of an ungrounded or potentially defective power tool or appliance could occur: The following condition contributed to the existence of this hazard: (a)M/V Independence, main switch gear area: An electrical outlet was improperly wired and indicated that the hot wire was connected to the neutral terminal. Note: One feasible means of abatement, among others, is to rewire and test the outlet for proper wire connections at the terminals before use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of falling to a lower level due to an unguarded opening: (a)M/V Independence: The employer failed to provide complete operational doors or gates with interlocking devices on the port forward freight elevator and the starboard forward freight elevator to prevent the elevators from being operated while any door or gate is opened. Employees could fall into the open elevator shaft if the elevator was not stopped at the platform or be struck by the moving car. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be the installation of either a mechanical or electrical interlocking device to prevent operations of the car with an open front.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $1,063 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1062.50
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Jul 10, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 1998
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Trident Seafoods Corporation
View Trident Seafoods Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in AK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 301494522.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.