OSHA Inspection: SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC.

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $125 · Current $125

General-duty citation text

North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to
each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)shop, welding area two web lanyards with a Crosby 2ton
hooks were used on the Spanco 2ton hoist; one hook had
a bent spring latch, the other hook was missing a spring
latch, and no records of hook inspections were performed.
One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard
is to provide monthly inspection of hooks with signed
reports.
b)shop, load test and certificate were not conducted and
maintained for the 2ton Spanco hoist and the Jet 1ton
hoist.
One feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard
is to tests load with no more than 125percent of the
rated load unless otherwise recommended by the
manufacturer.

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $100 · Current $100

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $125 · Current $125

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $100 · Current $100

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $100 · Current $100

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $125 · Current $125

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $125 · Current $125

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Penalty

Initial $100 · Current $100

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999

Issued

Nov 18, 1999

Abate by

Dec 21, 1999