BOSTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: NATIONAL WATER MAIN CLEANING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NATIONAL WATER MAIN CLEANING COMPANY, INCORPORATED in CHARLESGATE EAST & BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MA 02225 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304236920.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NATIONAL WATER MAIN CLEANING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- CHARLESGATE EAST & BEACON STREET
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02225
- Mailing
- 875 SUMMER STREET, NEWARK, NJ 07104
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1623
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2002
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards associated with confined space entry: National Water Main Cleaning Company, Incorporated, Charlesgate East and Beacon Street, Boston, MA: On or about 11/29/01, employees entered into, and worked inside of, the New Stony Brook conduit to remove accumulated sand and debris. During this project the employer did not follow the elements of an adequate and acceptable confined space program. These elements include, but are not limited to, 1) posting danger signs or other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and danger posed by the permit space. 2) The employer chose to select the Boston Fire Department as their rescue service, but failed to notify the appropriate section of the Fire Department of this decision. This is critical because the Fire Department must familiarize themselves with the conditions which exist at this site prior to any emergency arising to ensure the greatest chance of a successful rescue. By not coordinating with the Boston Fire Department, the employer exposed their employees to the hazards of inadequate rescue services in the event of an emergency. 3) While inside the conduit, employees had inadequate communications with the attendant due to "dead spots", or areas far inside the conduit where the hand-held communication devices would fail to receive a signal. In the event of an emergency, the employer, or rescue service, may not be able to communicate with the entrants. 4) Lighting inside the conduit was supplied only by the headlights of the machine performing the removal activities. If these headlights failed there would be no other worklights in the conduit. Among other means of abatement, one feasible and successful method to correct these deficiencies is to establish and implement a confined space entry program such as that specified in ANSI Z117.1-1995. The program would include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Communications equipment which would allow the attendant to continuously monitor entrant status and alert entrants of the need to evacuate the space; and 2) Lighting equipment needed to enable employees to exit the space quickly in an emergency; Also, when assembling a rescue team or contracting for another employer's employees to perform rescue activities, then National Water Main Cleaning Company must 1) Assess the capability of the rescue team to reach the victim(s) within a time frame that is appropriate for the permit space hazard(s) identified; 2) Ensure the team is equipped for, and proficient in, performing the needed rescue services; and 3) Be informed of the hazards they may confront when called on to perform rescue at the site.e
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $3000.00
1926.21 B06 I
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2002
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500.00
- — Z (S) $3000.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2002
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $100.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2002
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at National Water Main Cleaning Company, Incorporated
View National Water Main Cleaning Company, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304236920.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.