OSHA Inspection: SYRACUSE CHINA COMPANY, A SUB. OF LIBBEY GLASS INC

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazard of being struck by the load should the overhead
hoist, monorail
and/or below-the-hook lifting devices fail, not function properly or
should the load slip off the
hook from lack of safety latches:
a)On or about 12/13/01 through 1/30/02, the following overhead hoists had
broken safety latches on the lifting hooks and/or the lower limit switches
were
not functioning:
1.Mold Shop, Yale 1/8 ton overhead hoist located at table #3 had a
broken safety latch on the lifting hook.
2.Mold Shop, Yale 1/8 ton overhead hoist located between tables #1 and
#2 had a broken safety latch on the lifting hook.
3.Clay Prep, Cellar #1, Coffing one ton overhead hoist located at scrap
feeder #2 had a broken safety latch on the lifting hook.
4.Clay Prep, Cellar #2, Coffing two ton overhead hoist located at scrap
feeder #2 had a missing safety latch on the lifting hook and the lower
limit switch was not functioning.
5.Spray Glaze Dept., Glaze Making Batching Platform, CM Lodestar
1/8 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching
the hoist to the trolley.
6.Fire Power Kiln Car Repair, Coffing #30 three ton overhead hoist, the
lower limit switch was not functioning.
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct
these
hazards are to:
1.Install new safety latches on the lifting hooks in accordance with ANSI
B30.16-1993 Section 16-1.2.9.
2.Adjust the lower limit switches in accordance with ANSI B30.16-1993
Section 16-2.3.3.
b)On or about 12/13/01 through 1/30/02, the following below-the-hook
lifting
devices had no rated load capacity markings:
1.Clay Prep, Cellar #2, Scrap Feeder #2, a Bethlehem spreader beam
attached to a Coffing two ton overhead hoist had no rated load
capacity markings.2.Clay Prep, Cellar #4, Scrap Feeder #7, a spreader beam
attached to
a Coffing two ton overhead hoist had no rated load capacity markings.
3.Fire Power Car Repair Station, a spreader beam attached to a Coffing
three ton overhead hoist had no rated load capacity markings.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
hazard is to:
1.Mark the rated load of the lifting device on the main structure or
equivalent in accordance with ANSI B30.20-1993 Section 20-1.2.1.
c)On or about 12/13/01 through 1/30/02, the following monorails had no
rated
load capacity markings on them:
1.Spray Glaze Dept., Glaze Making Batching Platform, a monorail with
a CM Lodestar 1/8 ton overhead hoist #32 attached, had no rated load
capacity markings on the rail.
2.Mold Shop, a monorail with three Yale 1/8 ton overhead hoists and
one CM Lodestar overhead hoist attached, had no rated load capacity
markings on the rail.
3.Clay Prep, Cellar #1, a monorail with a Coffing #17 one ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
4.Clay Prep, Cellar #2, a monorail with a Coffing #23 two ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
5.Clay Prep, Cellar #4, a monorail with a Coffing #24 two ton overhead
hoist attached and a monorail with a Coffing #25 one ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rails.
6.Maintenance Shop, a monorail with a Coffing #28 one ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
7.Machine Shop, a monorail with a CM Lodestar #28 one ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
8.Power House, a monorail with a Dayton 1/2 ton overhead hoist
attached had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
9.Forklift Repair, a monorail with a Coffing #33 three ton overhead
hoist attached, had no rated load capacity markings on the rail.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is to:
1.Mark the rated load on the main structure in accordance with ANSI
B30.11-1980 Section 11-1.1.2.
Abatement certification must be submitted for items b-1, and b-2.

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $5,000 · Current $3,300 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $5,000 · Current $3,300 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $1,500 · Current $990 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Penalty

Initial $2,500 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jul 15, 2002

Penalty

Initial $25,000 · Current $20,000 Reduced

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002

Issued

Jun 11, 2002

Abate by

Jun 14, 2002