Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: H & H CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H & H CONSTRUCTION in VINE STREET AND ST. CLAIR, EASTLAKE, OH 44067 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 305324568.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H & H Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H & H Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
H & H CONSTRUCTION
Site address
VINE STREET AND ST. CLAIR
City
EASTLAKE
State
OH
ZIP
44067
Mailing
9450 LYNDBERG AVE., OLMSTEAD FALLS, OH 44138
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
4911
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2002
Abate by
Jun 12, 2002
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $735 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to:
On May 31, 2002, at a worksite near the corner of Vine Street and St.
Clair, Eastlake, OH, an
employee was observed working in the left lane of a 2-lane road during a
hoisting operation
without any means of protection from oncoming traffic.  The employee, who
was controlling
the tagline attached to a load being hoisted, was positioned so that the
flagger being used to
control traffic was behind the worker and unable to stop traffic before
the tagline employee was
exposed.
Among other feasible and acceptable abatement methods that could be used
to correct this
hazard, one is to reposition the flagger to be in front of the tagline
operator
so that traffic could
be stopped while he is required to work/stand directly in or around the
lane of traffic.  Other
means would be to utilize visual warning equipment such as traffic signs
and cones or utilize
physical barriers such as barrels to alert oncoming traffic to an active
worksite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $735.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2002
Abate by
Jun 12, 2002
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

View H & H Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305324568.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.