EASTLAKE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: H & H CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H & H CONSTRUCTION in VINE STREET AND ST. CLAIR, EASTLAKE, OH 44067 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 305324568.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H & H CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- VINE STREET AND ST. CLAIR
- City
- EASTLAKE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44067
- Mailing
- 9450 LYNDBERG AVE., OLMSTEAD FALLS, OH 44138
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4911
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2002
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2002
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $735 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: On May 31, 2002, at a worksite near the corner of Vine Street and St. Clair, Eastlake, OH, an employee was observed working in the left lane of a 2-lane road during a hoisting operation without any means of protection from oncoming traffic. The employee, who was controlling the tagline attached to a load being hoisted, was positioned so that the flagger being used to control traffic was behind the worker and unable to stop traffic before the tagline employee was exposed. Among other feasible and acceptable abatement methods that could be used to correct this hazard, one is to reposition the flagger to be in front of the tagline operator so that traffic could be stopped while he is required to work/stand directly in or around the lane of traffic. Other means would be to utilize visual warning equipment such as traffic signs and cones or utilize physical barriers such as barrels to alert oncoming traffic to an active worksite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $735.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2002
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2002
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at H & H Construction
View H & H Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305324568.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.