CHARLESTON, AR —
OSHA Inspection: STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY in HENDERSON # 5, 7 MILES N., CHARLESTON, AR 72341 (NAICS 213111). OSHA activity number 305818346.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY
- Site address
- HENDERSON # 5, 7 MILES N.
- City
- CHARLESTON
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72341
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2407, FORT SMITH, AR 72902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 130
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas, the employer needs to expand, review retrain and continue to maintain a company safety policy on Fall Protection, Disciplinary Action and Rig Communication with all rig employees. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: 1) Comply with American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet 54, paragraph 4.1 that require oil and gas well drilling and servicing operations to be conducted by careful,conscientious and responsible personnel. Also that employees receive training in correct work methods to reduce the chance of injury to themselves or fellow employees and that a safety program be established and maintained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas: Employees working on the monkey board of an oil well rig were required in the case of emergency to escape on an auxiliary line (geronimo escape line) that was attached to a tree ten feet above the ground, exposing employees to striking the tree and fall hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Comply with American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet 54, paragraph 4.7 that requires an auxiliary escape line from the mask to an obstructed area that is clear on the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas: Employees working on the monkey board of an oil well rig did not have the safety lanyard line that was attached to a structural member of the money board guardrail attached to the "O" ring of his safety harness, exposing an employee on or about August 26, 2002 to a fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Comply with the American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet, 54, paragraph 5.4 that requires a safety belt and lanyard line to be worn by employees working 10 feet or more above ground level and the lanyard line be attached to a structural member capable of supporting a minimum dead weight of 5,480 pounds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas: Employees working on the monkey board of an oil well rig did not have a communication program or procedures with supervisors on the ground below which exposed employee on or about August 26, 2002 to a fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Comply with the American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet 54, paragraph 11.3 requiring communication procedures between supervisors and employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas, the employer needs to expand, review retrain and continue to maintain a company safety policy on Fall Protection, Disciplinary Action and Rig Communication with all rig employees. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: 1) Comply with American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet 54, paragraph 4.1 that require oil and gas well drilling and servicing operations to be conducted by careful,conscientious and responsible personnel. Also that employees receive training in correct work methods to reduce the chance of injury to themselves or fellow employees and that a safety program be established and maintained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1700.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas: Employees working on the monkey board of an oil well rig did not have the safety lanyard line that was attached to a structural member of the money board guardrail attached to the "O" ring of his safety harness, exposing an employee on or about August 26, 2002 to a fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Comply with the American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet, 54, paragraph 5.4 that requires a safety belt and lanyard line to be worn by employees working 10 feet or more above ground level and the lanyard line be attached to a structural member capable of supporting a minimum dead weight of 5,480 pounds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2003
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Seven miles north of Charleston, Arkansas: Employees working on the monkey board of an oil well rig did not have a communication program or procedures with supervisors on the ground below which exposed employee on or about August 26, 2002 to a fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Comply with the American Petroleum Institute Pamphlet 54, paragraph 11.3 requiring communication procedures between supervisors and employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1750.00
More inspections at Stephens Production Company
View Stephens Production Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213111)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 305818346.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.