ELMIRA, NY —
OSHA Inspection: HARDINGE INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARDINGE INC. in 1 HARDINGE DRIVE, ELMIRA, NY 14903 (NAICS 333512). OSHA activity number 307687335.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARDINGE INC.
- Site address
- 1 HARDINGE DRIVE
- City
- ELMIRA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333512
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3541
- Employees
- 600
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
30 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
General-duty citation text
capacity markings. 4.Assembly, Pole H79, on or about 11/10/04: A below-the-hook lifting device attached to a CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist had no rated load capacity markings. 5.Heat Treat, on or about 11/17/04: A below-the-hook lifting device attached to a CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist had no rated load capacity markings. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to: 1.Mark the rated load of the lifting device on the main structure or equivalent in accordance with ASME B30.20-1993, Section 20-1.2.1. b)The following overhead hoists had broken or missing hook safety latches: 1.Scrape Area for Bridgeport, Pole L97, on or about 11/9/04: A Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching the hoist to the trolley on the jib. 2.Bridgeport Area, Pole K97, on or about 11/9/04: A Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching the hoist to the trolley on the jib. 3.Bridgeport Area, Pole J97, on or about 11/9/04: A Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching the hoist to the trolley on the jib. 4.Bridgeport Area, Pole H95, on or about 11/9/04: A Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching the hoist to the trolley on the jib. 5.Manual Mills, Pole K41, on or about 11/17/04: A CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a missing safety latch at the hook attaching the hoist to the trolley on the bridge crane. 6.Matsuura Area, between Poles P35 and P37, on or about 11/17/04: A CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist had a broken safety latch at the lifting hook. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards are to: 1.Install new safety latches on the hooks in accordance with ANSI B30.16-1993 Section 16-1.2.9. c)The following monorails, bridges and/or jibs had no rated load capacity markings on them, the pendant controls were not kept legible and the supporting structures for the hoists were underrated for what the hoist capacity was rated for: 1.Scrape Area for Bridgeport, Pole L97, on or about 11/9/04: A jib crane with a Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 2.Bridgeport Area, Pole K97, on or about 11/9/04: A jib crane with a Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 3.Bridgeport Area, Pole J97, on or about 11/9/04: A jib crane with a Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 4.Bridgeport Area, Pole H95, on or about 11/9/04: A jib crane with a Budgit 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 5.Assembly Area, between Poles F73 and G73, on or about 11/10/04: A bridge crane with a CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 6.Assembly Area, between Poles F75 and G75, on or about 11/10/04: A bridge crane with a CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 7.Manual Mills, Pole K41, on or about 11/17/04: A bridge crane with a CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist attached had no rated load capacity markings on it. 8.Steel Room, Pole C24, on or about 11/17/04: A 3 ton Shepard Niles underhung crane pendant control function labels were not legible. 9.Work Holding Chuck Cell, Pole F3, at the Hardinge Conquest VMC #2861, on or about 11/17/04: A CM Lodestar 1/2 ton overhead hoist was mounted on a bridge crane structure which was rated for 1/4 ton. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards are to: 1.Mark the rated load on the main structure in accordance with ANSI B30.11-1980, Section 11-1.1.2. 2.Mark the function labels on the pendant controls and keep them legible in accordance with ANSI B30.11-1980, Section 11-2.3.3. 3.Prior to use, ensure the supporting structure is designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load in accordance with ANSI B30.11-1980, Section 11-2.2.2. Abatement certification must be submitted for item a-4, a-5.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.125 F03
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $731 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $731.25
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.184 C02
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 I09 IV
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $731 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $731.25
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $731 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $731.25
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $731 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $731.25
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $731 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $731.25
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $975 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $975.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,219 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1218.75
- — Z (S) $1875.00
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.158 E02 III
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.304 E01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 14, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Hardinge INC.
View Hardinge INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333512)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 307687335.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.