Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: METALCRAFT OF MAYVILLE SE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METALCRAFT OF MAYVILLE SE, INC. in 7055 CAINDALE DRIVE, GREENSBORO, NC 27409 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 308552785.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Metalcraft of Mayville SE, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Metalcraft of Mayville SE, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7055 CAINDALE DRIVE
City
GREENSBORO
State
NC
ZIP
27409
Mailing
P O BOX 35608, GREENSBORO, NC 27425
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
SIC code (legacy)
3599
Employees
109
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

11 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,450 · Current $1,600 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees, in
that employees were exposed to:
a)being struck by or crushed by an unsecured load - Employees were not
trained to match weight
load capacity with the actual weight to be lifted by the below the hook
500 lb. magnet lifting
device to avoid the unsafe condition of lifting metal tubing weighing
between 500 and 1,000
pounds on January 4, 2005, resulting in the load being dropped and
striking an employees leg.
Reference:  ANSI B30.20-1985; paragraph 20-1.6.2 Qualifications.  (a) The
operator shall be
instructed in the use of the device by a designated person.  Instructions
should include, but not
be limited to the following:
(1) application of the lifter to the load and adjustments of the lifts, if
any, that adapt it to
various sizes or kinds of loads:
(2) instructions in ay special operations or precautions:
(3) condition of the load itself required for operation of the lifter such
as balance, or degree of
order of stacked loads, or surface cleanliness, bending, load thickness,
etc.:
(4) procedure for storage of lifter to protect it from damage:
(5) that the rated load of the lifting device not be exceeded nor the
capacity of the hoisting
equipment be exceeded by the combined weight of the load, the lifting
device, and rigging.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard was to
train the designated employees who operate the cranes and below the hook
lifting
devices to match the weight of the load to be lifted and not to exceed the
rate load
capacity of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600.00
  • — Z (S) $2450.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,450 · Current $1,600 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious
physical harm to employees, in
that employees were exposed to:
a)being struck by or crushed by an unsecured load - Below the hook 500 lb.
magnet lifting device
was loaded beyond it's capacity and weight load capacity was not matched
with the actual
weight to be lifted to avoid the unsafe condition of lifting the metal
tubing weighing between
500 and 1,000 pounds on January 4, 2005, resulting in the load being
dropped and striking an
employees leg.
Reference:  ANSI B30.20-1985; paragraph 20-1.6.4 Lifting Device Operating
Practices (b)
The lifting device shall not be loaded in excess of its rated load or
handle any load for which it
is not designed.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this
hazard was to have the weight of the item being lifted not exceed to rate
load
capacity of the below the hook lifting device.  (The magnet capacity was
500lbs
and the metal tubing being lifted weighed between 500 and 1000 lbs.)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600.00
  • — Z (S) $2450.00

1910.178 L01 I

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,450 · Current $1,600 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600.00
  • — Z (S) $2450.00

1910.178 A06

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
Jul 1, 2005
Recent events (2)
  • — P (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.178 Q07

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
Apr 13, 2005

1910.179 J02 III

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
Jun 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,450 · Current $1,600 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1600.00
  • — I (S) $1600.00
  • — Z (S) $2450.00

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
Jun 20, 2005
Recent events (2)
  • — P (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.212 A01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
Jun 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $2,450 · Current $1,600 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1600.00
  • — I (S) $1600.00
  • — Z (S) $2450.00

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005

1910.146 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2005
Abate by
May 20, 2005

View Metalcraft of Mayville SE, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308552785.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.