SYRACUSE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: OBERDORFER, L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OBERDORFER, L.L.C. in 6259 THOMPSON RD., SYRACUSE, NY 13206 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 309381184.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OBERDORFER, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 6259 THOMPSON RD.
- City
- SYRACUSE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3365
- Employees
- 95
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
23 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- May 31, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to THE HAZARD OF BEING STRUCK-BY: a) Core Room, Station 36, Osborne Roll-Over, on or about 4/27/06: Employee was operating a 1/2 ton capacity air-operated chain hoist with no inspection procedures developed and utilized for the hoist. b) Core Room, Pep Set, on or before 4/27/06: Employee was operating a air- operated chain hoist with no inspection procedures developed and utilized for the hoist. c) Core Room, Shell Area, on or about 5/2/06: Employee was operating (2) air- operated chain hoists with no inspection procedures developed and utilized for these hoists. d) Core Room, Core Assembly Area, on or about 5/2/06: Employee was operating a Gardner-Denver air-operated chain hoist with no inspection procedures developed and utilized for the hoist. e) Core Room, Dry Sand Core Assembly, on or about 5/2/06: Employee was operating a air - operated chain hoist with no inspection procedures developed and utilized for the hoist. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to ensure that the air- operated chain hoists be inspected per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16-1993, Chapter 16-2, Sections 16-2.1.1, 16-2.1.2 and 16-2.1.3. f) Core Room, Pep Set, on or about 4/27/06: One air-operated chain hoist capacity was not marked on the hoist or load block. g) Core Room, Shell Area, on or about 5/2/06: Two air-operated chain hoists capacity was not marked on the hoist or load block. h) Core Room, Dry Sand Core Assembly, on or about 5/2/06: One air-operated chain hoist capacity was not marked on the hoist or load block. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to ensure that the rated load of each hoist is marked on the hoist or load block per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16-1993, Chapter 16-1, Section 16-1.1 i) Core Room, Pep Set, on or about 4/27/06: The supporting structure including the monorail for the air- operated chain hoist was not designed nor rated to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load.j) Core Room, Shell Area, on or about 5/2/06: The supporting structure including the monorail for two air-operated chain hoists was not designed nor rated to withstand the loads and forces imposed by two air-operated chain hoists for the rated loads. k) Core Room, Dry Sand Core Assembly, on or about 5/2/06: The supporting structure including the monorail for the air-operated chain hoist was not designed nor rated to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to have a qualified person review the design of the supporting structures and establish rated load capacities as per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16-1993, Chapter 16-1, Section 16-1.3.2. l) Core Room, Pep Set, on or about 4/27/06: Below-the-hook lifting devices used to support molds and attach loads to an air-powered chain hoist were not marked as to their rated capacity. m) Foundry Dept., 1175 Head Line, on or about 5/3/06: Below-the-hook lifting device used to lift and support degasser unit and attach loads to an air powered cain hoist was not marked as to its rated capacity. n) Foundry Dept., 1175 Head Line, # 2 Clam on or about 5/3/06: Below-the-hook lifting device used to lift cylinder head molds with molten metal was not marked as to its rated capacity. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement is to have a qualified person review the design of the below-the-hook devices and have their established capacities marked on the devices per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.20-1993, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.2.1. o) Core Room, Pep Set, Foundry Dept. 1175 Head Line, on or about 5/3/06: Below- the-hook lifting devices used to lift and/or support molds and attach loads to air- powered hoists were not being inspected using the frequent and periodic procedures as specified in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.20-1993. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to ensure that the below- the-hook lifting devices be inspected per American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME B30.20-1.3.1. p) Foundry Dept., Bay 9A, on or about 5/4/06: Pendant control station for Yale five ton crane was not supported in a manner as to protect the electrical conductors against strain. ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to provide a wire rope and/or chain attached to the pendant control and hoist motor control per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16, Chapter 16, Section 16-1.2.3(d). Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $568.75
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.23 C03
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.25 D01 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.27 C02
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.102 A
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $341 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $341.25
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.144 A01 III
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 C03
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $455.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.303 B01 VII
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $341 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $341.25
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $569 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $568.75
- — Z (S) $875.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1625.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
More inspections at Oberdorfer, L.L.C.
View Oberdorfer, L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309381184.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.