BROOKLYN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: CITY RECYCLING CORP.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of CITY RECYCLING CORP. in 151 ANTHONY ST, BROOKLYN, NY 11222 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 309958643.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CITY RECYCLING CORP.
- Site address
- 151 ANTHONY ST
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11222
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562920
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4953
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
21 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by or crushed by heavy equipment (Bulldozers and Trackhoe machines) when the machine is operating and during repairs: Location: Recycling transfer-station facility located at 151 Anthony St, Brooklyn, N.Y. On or about 04/24/06. a)Jack-stands did not comply with the manufacturers specifications. Shop made jack stands were made from a piece of pipe welded to a base plate and were used in the bulldozer repair shop to support the bulldozer 18 inches above the floor. Employees can be injured if the jack-stands fail to hold the weight. b)A blocking bar was not used to support the bulldozer cab when the cab was raised up for repairs. The cab was supported only by a chain and can fall onto an employee if the chain fails or comes loose. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS: Use equipment (jack-stands and blocking devices) suggested by the manufacturer (Caterpillar) or designed by and approved by an engineer. Develop and maintain a standard operating procedure(s) for the maintenance of the heavy equipment. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $6,469
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by or crushed by heavy equipment (Bulldozers and Trackhoe machines) when the machine is operating and during repairs: Location: Recycling transfer-station facility located at 151 Anthony St, Brooklyn, N.Y. On or about 04/24/06. c)Horns (audible warning device) were not provided for the two Caterpillar Track- loader (bulldozers) in order to allow the operator to warn of danger or signal to employees in the recycling yard. d)A backup alarm was not provided for the Komatsu 320 Trackhoe machine to warn employees on foot when the machine operates in reverse. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS: Install and use horns and backup alarm on the machines. Horns are provided as a standard safety feature (warning/ signalling device) on the Track Hoe bulldozers by the manufacturer, Caterpillar, and must be maintained operable by employers who use that equipment. Backup alarms are an industry recognized safety signal for bi-directional machines such as the Komatsu 320 Trackhoe machine, as required by ANSI standard Z245.1- 1999 'Safety Requirements for Mobile Wastes and Recyclable Collection, Transportation, and Compaction Equipment' part 7.2.14.1 Warning Signals. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.23 D01 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.213 C01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.213 C02
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.305 A02 IIIG
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.305 G01 IIIA
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $42,000 · Current $6,469 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by or buried by construction debris that was being loaded into container trucks: Location: 151 Anthony St, Brooklyn, N.Y. a) The employer does not protect its employees from the hazard of being crushed by loaded material when they are working in the beds of trucks. A recent instance of this violation occurred on 04/22/06 when an employee working alone in the bed of a haul truck was crushed by material which was loaded into the truck while he was working there. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS: 1)Develop and enforce a written standard operating procedure and train all the employees. 2)Install mirrors strategically installed to allow the bulldozer operator to be able to view the area where the employees are working inside the truck body from different angles. 3)Install warning devices on the top of the truck body which warn the operators of the bulldozers that a person is in the body of the truck. 4)Enforce the work rule of a buddy system (Co-worker to signal the bulldozer operator that it is safe to dump the load). Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure compliance, including a description of how these protect its employees from the hazards involved in entering the beds of trucks while they are being loaded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $42000.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $6,469
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6468.75
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.305 A02 IIIG
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
More inspections at City Recycling Corp.
View City Recycling Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562920)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309958643.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.