Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALL-FEED PROCESSING AND PACKAGING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALL-FEED PROCESSING AND PACKAGING, INC. in 717 W. DIVISION ST., GALVA, IL 61434 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 310802228.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch All-Feed Processing and Packaging, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for All-Feed Processing and Packaging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
717 W. DIVISION ST.
City
GALVA
State
IL
ZIP
61434
Mailing
PO BOX 171, ALPHA, IL 61413
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311119
SIC code (legacy)
2048
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

24 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,471 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of crushing injuries:
Employees working in the Pellet Mill and South Mill were exposed to the
hazard of being
crushed by a load suspended from the cranes located above the hoppers
because the cranes
were not marked with the rated load.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to mark the crane with the rated load in accordance with ASME
B30.11-1998, American
Society of Mechanical Engineers for Monorails and Underhung Cranes,
Section 11-1.1.1.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of crushing injuries:
Employees working in the Pellet Mill and South Mill were exposed to the
hazard of being
crushed by a load suspended from the cranes located above the hoppers
because the employer
failed to establish and follow a program of frequent and periodic
inspections of the crane
system.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to establish and follow a program of frequent and periodic inspections
of the crane system
in accordance with ASME B30.11-1998, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
for
Monorails and Underhung Cranes, Section 11-2.1.5.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of crushing injuries:
Employees working in the Pellet Mill and South Mill were exposed to the
hazard of being
crushed by a load suspended from the Coffing, Budgit and CM Hoists located
above the
hoppers and the employer failed to establish and follow a program of
frequent and periodic
inspections of the hoist system.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
this hazard
is to establish and follow a program of frequent and periodic inspection
of the hoist system in
accordance with ASME B30.16-2003, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
for
Overhead Hoists (Underhung), Section 16-2.1.5.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,471 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of crushing injuries:
Employees working in the Pellet Mill and South Mill were exposed to the
hazard of being
crushed by a load suspended from the Coffing, Budgit and CM Hoists located
above the
hoppers because the lifting devices were not marked with the rated load
where
it was visible
and a nameplate of the permanent marking was not affixed on the lifting
device containing
the manufacturer name and address, serial number, lifter weight and the
rated load.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to mark the rated load of the lifting device on the main structure
where it is visible and
affix a nameplate or other permanent marking displaying the manufacturer's
name and
address, serial number, lift weight and rated load in accordance with ASME
B30.20-2006,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers for Below-the-Hook Lifting
Devices, Section 20-
1.2.1.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,059 Reduced

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,059 Reduced

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,059 Reduced

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $588 Reduced

1910.157 C04

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,059 Reduced

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,059 Reduced

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 26, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,250 · Current $735 Reduced

1910.219 E04

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 26, 2009

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 26, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,250 · Current $735 Reduced

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 26, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,750 · Current $1,029 Reduced

1910.303 E01

Serious Gravity 05 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 26, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,750 · Current $1,029 Reduced

1910.303 F01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,750 · Current $1,029 Reduced

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Jan 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $456 Reduced

1910.305 G01 IVA

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Feb 17, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $558 Reduced

1910.178 C02 VII

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 3, 2009
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $10,000 Reduced

1910.307 C

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $10,000 Reduced

View All-Feed Processing and Packaging, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 310802228.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.