Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NICKLES BAKERY, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NICKLES BAKERY, INC. in 1000 BROADWAY STREET, MARTINS FERRY, OH 43935 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 311840532.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nickles Bakery, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nickles Bakery, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1000 BROADWAY STREET
City
MARTINS FERRY
State
OH
ZIP
43935
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
SIC code (legacy)
2051
Employees
125
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 5 instances 46 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Jun 12, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,250 · Current $1,350 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
flour dust explosion, deflagration, or
other fire hazards:
a.On or about February 12, 2009, in the new flour room, the vent on bulk
flour storage bin #5 which was
designed to discharge to the building atmosphere did not have a filter.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct
this hazard include following NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of
Fires and Dust Explosions in
Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities (2008 Edition), including, but
not limited to:  installing a
filter having a minimum efficiency of 99.9at 10 microns.
b.On or about February 12, 2009, in the basement, the vents on bulk flour
storage bins #2 and 3 which
were designed to discharge to a separate drum and to the building
atmosphere
did not have filters having
a minimum efficiency of 99.9at 10 microns.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct
this hazard include following NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of
Fires and Dust Explosions in
Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities (2008 Edition), including, but
not limited to:  installing a
filter having a minimum efficiency of 99.9at 10 microns.
c.On or about February 12, 2009, in the new flour room and basement, the
two dust collection systems
(baghouses) did not have a monitoring system to indicate pressure drop
across the filter media.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct
this hazard include following NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of
Fires and Dust Explosions in
Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities (2008 Edition), including, but
not limited to:  installing a
monitoring device such as a differential pressure gauge to indicate
pressure
drop across the filter media.
d.On or about February 12, 2009, in the new flour room and basement, the
two dust collection systems
(baghouses) which were located inside of the building were not equipped
with deflagration venting or an
explosion suppression system.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct
this hazard include following NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of
Fires and Dust Explosions in
Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities (2008 Edition), including, but
not limited to:  equipping the
dust collectors with deflagration venting to the outside through straight
ducts not exceeding 20 feet in
length and designed so that the explosion pressures would not rupture the
ductwork or the collectors;
equipping the dust collectors with an explosion suppression system
designed according to NFPA 69; or
relocating the dust collectors outside of the building and protecting them
in accordance with Section 6.3.
e.On or about February 12, 2009, in the new flour room and basement,
deflagration isolation devices
were not installed between the dust collectors (baghouses) and the bulk
flour storage bins to eliminate
explosion or deflagration propagation.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct
this hazard include following NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of
Fires and Dust Explosions in
Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities (2008 Edition), including, but
not limited to:  installing
deflagration isolation between the dust collectors and the bulk storage
bins.ge
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350.00
  • — Z (S) $2250.00

1910.145 C03

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 46 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Apr 12, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,250 · Current $1,350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350.00
  • — Z (S) $2250.00

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 46 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Apr 12, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,250 · Current $1,350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350.00
  • — Z (S) $2250.00

1910.307 C

Serious Gravity 03 3 instances 46 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Jul 12, 2009
Penalty
Initial $2,250 · Current $1,350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350.00
  • — Z (S) $2250.00

1910.95 L01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 46 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2009
Abate by
Mar 13, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Nickles Bakery, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311840532.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.