LINDEN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: CONOCOPHILLIPS BAYWAY REFINERY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONOCOPHILLIPS BAYWAY REFINERY in 1400 PARK AVE., LINDEN, NJ 07036 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 311915854.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONOCOPHILLIPS BAYWAY REFINERY
- Site address
- 1400 PARK AVE.
- City
- LINDEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07036
- Mailing
- 1400 PARK AVE, LINDEN, NJ 07036
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324110
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2911
- Employees
- 830
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that the equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: a- ISOM2 - The employer did not comply with a RAGAGEP such as, but not limited to, API 2218 when it failed to fireproof steel pipe supports and associated hydrocarbon lines located within the fire envelope of P-501A. Condition noted on or about 02/17/09
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 E05
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer failed to establish a system to promptly address the process hazard analysis team's findings and recommendations and to assure that the recommendations were resolved in a timely manner: a- ISOM2 - The following item from the 2006 Isomerization Unit Process Hazard Analysis was not addressed in a timely manner: Action Item 64667, Cat II, Audit Date 03/06/06, The recommended actions were not conducted until 12/18/08 some 3 months after a catastrophic fire at the P-501A and resulted in the recommendation to install tandem seals on P-501A/B. Condition noted on or about 02/17/09.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and which addressed the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i) through (f)(1)(iv): a- ISOM2 - ISOM Operating and Emergency Procedure 03.04.01 Pump Flange Fires incorrectly identified the use of Emergency Block Valve (EBVs) numbers 13 and 14 in the case of a major fire. These valves were listed on the Piping and Instrument Diagram (P&ID) 104-14LA-1 as Motor Operated Valves (MOVs) and not EBVs. The correct valves to be used in this procedure were Emergency Isolation Valves (EIVs) numbers 3 and 4. Condition noted on or about 02/18/09.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (as defined by process information in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)) before further use or in a safe and timely manner: a- ISOM2 - The following equipment deficiencies were noted: 1) The P-501A was allowed to operate with a motor that was grossly overfilled with oil and there were no means to drain/check the condition of the oil to include accumulation of water, 2) The drain port on the P-501A seal flange was not plugged, 3) Oil mist connections to the motor on P-501A were installed improperly with compression type fittings used without thread sealant, 4) The P-501A motor used an inferior plastic oil cup/reservoir with a "bullseye" design. Condition noted on or about 2/17/09
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process: a- ISOM2 - The employer failed to perform a management of change (MOC) for the following: 1) As part of the 1995 Butamer project the P-501A pump was de-staged and was found to be operating below its minimum flow design, 2) The oil mist system was initially designed to service 32 users but prior to the incident it was supplying the same amount of oil to only 2 users (P-501A and P-501B), 3) The P-501A motor was overhauled in 2008 with the vendor installing a differently designed oiler consisting of a plastic cup/reservoir and "bullseye" to monitor oil level. Condition noted on or about 02/17/09n
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 L03
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(3): Employees involved in operating a process and maintenance and contract employees whose job tasks will be affected by a change in the process were not informed of, and trained in, the change prior to start-up of the process or affected part of the process: a- ISOM2 - The P-501A motor was overhauled in 2008 with the vendor installing a differently designed oiler consisting of a plastic cup/reservoir and "bullseye" to monitor oil level. Operators were not trained on how to properly read and maintain oil levels on the newly installed oiler. In addition, mechanics were not instructed on the operation and maintenance of the above noted oiler. Condition noted on or about 02/18/09.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.119 L04
- Issued
- Mar 5, 2009
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(4): A change covered by 29 CFR 1910.119(l) resulted in a change in the process safety information required by 29 CFR 1910.119(d) and process information was not updated: a- ISOM2 - The Seal Vent for P-501A/B, noted as Detail C on P&ID 104-14LA-24, was incorrect and did not reflect the "as built" arrangement on the unit. Condition noted on or about 02/17/09. b- ISOM2 - The Oil Mist Lubrication System found on P&ID 104-14LA-21 was incorrect and did not reflect conditions on the unit. The P&ID indicated that the system serviced pumps and exchangers to include some 32 users to include P-502A/B, P-504A/B, P-509B, P-510B, P-505A/B, P-507A/B, P-601A/B, E-503A-D, E-505A-C, E-506A/B, E-509, E-513A/B and E-612A/B. However, it was found that the system only serviced 2 users, P-501A/B. Condition noted on or about 02/17/09.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $5000.00
More inspections at Conocophillips Bayway Refinery
View Conocophillips Bayway Refinery's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324110)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311915854.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.