Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONOCOPHILLIPS BAYWAY REFINERY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONOCOPHILLIPS BAYWAY REFINERY in 1400 PARK AVE., LINDEN, NJ 07036 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 311915854.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conocophillips Bayway Refinery — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conocophillips Bayway Refinery is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1400 PARK AVE.
City
LINDEN
State
NJ
ZIP
07036
Mailing
1400 PARK AVE, LINDEN, NJ 07036
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324110
SIC code (legacy)
2911
Employees
830
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii):  The employer did not document that the
equipment in the
process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering
practices:
a- ISOM2 -  The employer did not comply with a RAGAGEP such as, but not
limited
to, API 2218 when it failed to fireproof steel pipe supports and associated
hydrocarbon lines located within the fire envelope of P-501A.
Condition noted on or about 02/17/09
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 E05

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5):  The employer failed to establish a system to
promptly address the
process hazard analysis team's findings and recommendations and to assure
that the
recommendations were resolved in a timely manner:
a- ISOM2 - The following item from the 2006 Isomerization Unit Process
Hazard
Analysis was not addressed in a timely manner:
Action Item 64667, Cat II, Audit Date 03/06/06, The recommended actions
were
not
conducted until 12/18/08 some 3 months after a catastrophic fire at the
P-501A and
resulted in the recommendation to install tandem seals on P-501A/B.
Condition noted on or about 02/17/09.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1):  The employer did not develop and implement written
operating
procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting
activities in each covered
process consistent with the process safety information and which addressed
the elements
listed in 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i) through (f)(1)(iv):
a- ISOM2 - ISOM Operating and Emergency Procedure 03.04.01 Pump Flange
Fires
incorrectly identified the use of Emergency Block Valve (EBVs) numbers 13
and 14
in the case of a major fire.  These valves were listed on the Piping and
Instrument
Diagram (P&ID) 104-14LA-1 as Motor Operated Valves (MOVs) and not EBVs.
The
correct valves to be used in this procedure were Emergency Isolation
Valves (EIVs)
numbers 3 and 4.
Condition noted on or about 02/18/09.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5):  The employer did not correct deficiencies in
equipment that were
outside acceptable limits (as defined by process information in 29 CFR
1910.119(d)) before
further use or in a safe and timely manner:
a- ISOM2 - The following equipment deficiencies were noted:
1) The P-501A was allowed to operate with a motor that was grossly
overfilled
with oil and there were no means to drain/check the condition of the oil to
include accumulation of water,
2) The drain port on the P-501A seal flange was not plugged,
3) Oil mist connections to the motor on P-501A were installed improperly
with
compression type fittings used without thread sealant,
4) The P-501A motor used an inferior plastic oil cup/reservoir with a
"bullseye" design.
Condition noted on or about 2/17/09
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1):  The employer did not establish and implement
written procedures to
manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and
procedures; and, changes
to facilities that affect a covered process:
a- ISOM2 - The employer failed to perform a management of change (MOC) for
the
following:
1) As part of the 1995 Butamer project the P-501A pump was de-staged and
was found to be operating below its minimum flow design,
2) The oil mist system was initially designed to service 32 users but
prior to
the incident it was supplying the same amount of oil to only 2 users
(P-501A
and P-501B),
3) The P-501A motor was overhauled in 2008 with the vendor installing a
differently designed oiler consisting of a plastic cup/reservoir and
"bullseye" to
monitor oil level.
Condition noted on or about 02/17/09n
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 L03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(3):  Employees involved in operating a process and
maintenance and
contract employees whose job tasks will be affected by a change in the
process were not
informed of, and trained in, the change prior to start-up of the process
or affected part of the
process:
a- ISOM2 - The P-501A motor was overhauled in 2008 with the vendor
installing a
differently designed oiler consisting of a plastic cup/reservoir and
"bullseye" to
monitor oil level.  Operators were not trained on how to properly read and
maintain
oil levels on the newly installed oiler.  In addition, mechanics were not
instructed on
the operation and maintenance of the above noted oiler.
Condition noted on or about 02/18/09.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 L04

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 5, 2009
Abate by
Apr 20, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,000
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(4):  A change covered by 29 CFR 1910.119(l) resulted in
a change in
the process safety information required by 29 CFR 1910.119(d) and process
information was
not updated:
a- ISOM2 - The Seal Vent for P-501A/B, noted as Detail C on P&ID
104-14LA-24,
was incorrect and did not reflect the "as built" arrangement on the unit.
Condition
noted on or about 02/17/09.
b- ISOM2 - The Oil Mist Lubrication System found on P&ID 104-14LA-21 was
incorrect and did not reflect conditions on the unit.  The P&ID indicated
that the
system serviced pumps and exchangers to include some 32 users to include
P-502A/B,
P-504A/B, P-509B, P-510B, P-505A/B, P-507A/B, P-601A/B, E-503A-D, E-505A-C,
E-506A/B, E-509, E-513A/B and E-612A/B.  However, it was found that the
system
only serviced 2 users, P-501A/B.
Condition noted on or about 02/17/09.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

View Conocophillips Bayway Refinery's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311915854.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.