MARCUS HOOK, PA —
OSHA Inspection: J.J. WHITE, INC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of J.J. WHITE, INC. in 100 GREEN STREET (SUNOCO MH), MARCUS HOOK, PA 19061 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 312488661.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.J. WHITE, INC.
- Site address
- 100 GREEN STREET (SUNOCO MH)
- City
- MARCUS HOOK
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19061
- Mailing
- 5500 BINGHAM STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19120
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye and/or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery - The employer did not ensure employees used appropriate eye protection, as evident by the fact that a J. J. White employee working in the 15-2 Plant attempted to remove a ball valve in acid service, and the employer did not ensure the employee wore chemical-resistant goggles, on or about 12/30/2008. NOTE: DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS CONDITION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iv): The contract employer shall assure that each contract employee follows the safety rules of the facility including the safe work practices required by paragraph (f)(4) of this section: a) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery - J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure that employees followed established procedures for opening process equipment or piping, as evident by the fact that a contract employee attempted to remove a ball valve in the 15-2 Plant, on 12/30/2008, and J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure the employee followed the procedures detailed in Sunoco Safety Standard #19: "Draining, Unplugging, Opening, and Blanking/Blinding Lines, Vessels, and Process Equipment" and Sunoco Safety Standard #17: Personal Protective Equipment and Safety Equipment. The employee was splashed with acid resulting in first and second degree burns to the face and neck. Violation documented on or about 01/13/2009. b) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery - J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure that employees followed established procedures for opening process equipment or piping, as evident by the fact that an employee attempted to remove a ball valve in the 15-2 Plant, on 12/30/2008, and J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure the employee followed the procedures detailed in Sunoco Safety Standard #55 "Job Safety Analysis Card Use." Violation documented on or about 01/13/2009. c) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery - J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure that employees followed established procedures for opening process equipment or piping, as evident by the fact that a contract employee attempted to remove a ball valve in the 15-2 Plant, on 12/30/2008, and J.J. White, Inc. did not ensure the employee followed the procedures detailed in Sunoco Heath and Safety Procedure Number 3052: "Permit System Rules." Violation documented on or about 01/13/2009. NOTE: DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS CONDITION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1904.7 B04
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2009
- Abate by
- Aug 3, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): When an injury or illness involved restricted work or job transfer but does not involve death or days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log by placing a check mark in the space for job transfer or restriction and an entry of the number of restricted or transferred days in the restricted workdays column.: a) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery: A recordable injury occurred to a J.J. White employee working at the 15-2 Alkylation Unit on 12/30/2008. The employee was prescribed limited duty with restrictions, and the employer did not mark the injury as"Job Transfer or Restriction", and did not enter the number of days of transfer or restriction. On or about 2/09/2009. CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS VIOLATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $900.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
More inspections at J.J. White, INC.
View J.J. White, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 312488661.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.