Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD in 540 E US HWY 24, GILMAN, IL 60938 (NAICS 311222). OSHA activity number 314847583.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Incobrasa Industries, LTD for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Incobrasa Industries, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
540 E US HWY 24
City
GILMAN
State
IL
ZIP
60938
Mailing
PO BOX 98, GILMAN, IL 60938
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311222
SIC code (legacy)
2075
Employees
140
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 B02 IVC

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(2)(iv)(c):  Low-pressure tanks and pressure vessels
were not adequately
vented to prevent development of pressure or vacuum, as a result of
filling or emptying and
atmospheric temperature changes, from exceeding the design pressure of the
tank or vessel.
Protection shall also be provided to prevent overpressure from any pump
discharging into the
tank or vessel when the pump discharge pressure can exceed the design
pressure of the tank or
vessel:
At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not ensure vessels were
adequately vented to prevent
a vacuum as a result of filling or emptying and atmospheric temperature
changes.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $6300.00
  • · Z (S) $6300.00

1910.119 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1):  The employer did not perform an initial process
hazard
analysis
(hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119:
At Incobrasa Industries, a process hazard analysis was not implemented on
processes that were
covered by OSHA's Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals
standard.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $6300.00
  • · Z (S) $6300.00

1910.119 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):  The employer did not establish and implement
written procedures to
maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment:
At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not establish and implement
written procedures for
items such as, but not limited to:
a.Written procedures for inspection and inspection frequency to maintain
the on
going integrity of vessels and tanks in the facility;
b.Written procedures for maintaining the on going integrity of piping in
the
Extraction Building;
c.Written procedures for maintaining the instrumentation in the Extraction
Building;
d.Written procedures for maintaining the pumps in the facility;
e.Written procedures for maintaining the on going integrity of the
electrical process
equipment and installations.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $6300.00
  • · Z (S) $6300.00

1910.119 J04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did perform inspections and tests on
process equipment.
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $6300.00
  • · Z (S) $6300.00

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii):  Inspections and testing procedures performed
on process equipment
to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and
generally accepted good
engineering practices:
At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did perform inspections and tests on
process equipment
per recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).
***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
Apr 12, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii):  Oxygen cylinders in storage were not
separated from fuelgas
cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum
distance of 20 feet (6.1
m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a
fireresistance rating of
at least onehalf hour:
At Incobrasa Industries, employees were exposed to the hazard of burns in
the event of a fire
or being struck by flying cylinders or objects and full oxygen and
acetylene cylinders were not
separated as required by the standard.
***Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(c)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $3600.00
  • · Z (S) $3600.00

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Penalty
Current $6,300
Recent events (3)
  • · Q $6300.00
  • · F (S) $6300.00
  • · Z (S) $6300.00

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.119 J04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.119 H02 VI

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance
Issued
Mar 17, 2011
Abate by
Apr 12, 2011
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(vi):  The employer did not maintain a contract
employee injury and
illness log related to contractor's work in process areas:
At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not maintain OSHA 300 Forms for
contractors at their
facility.
***Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with
the requirements
of 29 CFR 1903.19(c)***
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O) $900.00
  • · Z (O) $900.00

View Incobrasa Industries, LTD's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 314847583.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.