GILMAN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD in 540 E US HWY 24, GILMAN, IL 60938 (NAICS 311222). OSHA activity number 314847583.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD
- Site address
- 540 E US HWY 24
- City
- GILMAN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60938
- Mailing
- PO BOX 98, GILMAN, IL 60938
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311222
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2075
- Employees
- 140
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 B02 IVC
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(2)(iv)(c): Low-pressure tanks and pressure vessels were not adequately vented to prevent development of pressure or vacuum, as a result of filling or emptying and atmospheric temperature changes, from exceeding the design pressure of the tank or vessel. Protection shall also be provided to prevent overpressure from any pump discharging into the tank or vessel when the pump discharge pressure can exceed the design pressure of the tank or vessel: At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not ensure vessels were adequately vented to prevent a vacuum as a result of filling or emptying and atmospheric temperature changes. ***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $6300.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119: At Incobrasa Industries, a process hazard analysis was not implemented on processes that were covered by OSHA's Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals standard. ***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $6300.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment: At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not establish and implement written procedures for items such as, but not limited to: a.Written procedures for inspection and inspection frequency to maintain the on going integrity of vessels and tanks in the facility; b.Written procedures for maintaining the on going integrity of piping in the Extraction Building; c.Written procedures for maintaining the instrumentation in the Extraction Building; d.Written procedures for maintaining the pumps in the facility; e.Written procedures for maintaining the on going integrity of the electrical process equipment and installations. ***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $6300.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests were not performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity: At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did perform inspections and tests on process equipment. ***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $6300.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspections and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did perform inspections and tests on process equipment per recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP). ***Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuelgas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fireresistance rating of at least onehalf hour: At Incobrasa Industries, employees were exposed to the hazard of burns in the event of a fire or being struck by flying cylinders or objects and full oxygen and acetylene cylinders were not separated as required by the standard. ***Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $3600.00
- · Z (S) $3600.00
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
- Penalty
- Current $6,300
Recent events (3)
- · Q $6300.00
- · F (S) $6300.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- May 3, 2011
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.119 H02 VI
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2011
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(vi): The employer did not maintain a contract employee injury and illness log related to contractor's work in process areas: At Incobrasa Industries, the employer did not maintain OSHA 300 Forms for contractors at their facility. ***Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c)***
Recent events (2)
- · F (O) $900.00
- · Z (O) $900.00
More inspections at Incobrasa Industries, LTD
View Incobrasa Industries, LTD's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311222)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 314847583.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.