Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ISOMETRICS, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ISOMETRICS, INC. in 7537 NC HIGHWAY 87, REIDSVILLE, NC 27320 (NAICS 332420). OSHA activity number 316472232.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Isometrics, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Isometrics, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ISOMETRICS, INC.
Site address
7537 NC HIGHWAY 87
City
REIDSVILLE
State
NC
ZIP
27320
Mailing
PO BOX 660, REIDSVILLE, NC 27323
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332420
SIC code (legacy)
3499
Employees
6
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

9 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $250 · Current $150 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to being struck by falling loads:
a)Facility -  there were underhung cranes throughout the facility used to
manipulate and
move tanks and steel during the manufacturing process.   The upper limit
switches on
the hoists were not tested without a load at the beginning of each work
shift.
REFERENCE:  ANSI B30.11-1980, Section 11-2.1.2, Frequent Inspection.
(b)Items such as the following shall be inspected at intervals as defined
in 11-2.1.1(b)(1).
Observation should be made during operation for any defects or damage
which might
appear between inspections.  Any deficiencies, such as listed, shall be
carefully
examined, and a determination made as to whether they constitute a hazard:
(1)All functional operating mechanisms for misadjustment interfering with
proper operation.
(2)All limit switches should be checked, without a load, on the hook, at
the
beginning of each work shift.  Care shall be exercised.  Each motion
shall be inched to its limit switch or run in slow speeds.
(3)Leakage in lines, tanks, valves, pumps, and other parts of pneumatic or
hydraulic lines.
NOTE:  Among other means of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method
to correct this
hazard is to test the upper limit switches of all hoists at the beginning
of each work shift.
b)Welding Station - the JET underhung one-ton bridge crane was operating
in the area
equipped with fabricated below-the-hook lifting devices that had not been
load rated,
and load testing information was not available for the device.  The
below-the-hook
lifting device that had been fabricated was used to lift steel fifth wheel
plates for trucks.
The device had not been load tested to ensure that the device could
successfully lift the
one-ton capacity of the crane and other lifting components.  There was
neither a label
present with the rated load of the lifting device, nor a test certificate
to show the results
of the load testing for the below-the-hook lifting device.
REFERENCE:  ASME B30.20-1999, Section 1.2.1, Markings.
The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the main structure
where it is
visible.
NOTE:  Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable
method to correct this
hazard is to load test the below-the-hook lifting device, then place the
label of rated load
capacity on the below-the-hook lifting device.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $150.00
  • — Z (S) $250.00

1910.132 A

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $250 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $150.00
  • — Z (S) $250.00

1910.178 Q07

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.176 B

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $250 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $150.00
  • — Z (S) $250.00

1910.252 B02 III

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100.00
  • — Z (S) $100.00

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.304 G05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.305 A04 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2012
Abate by
Jun 26, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Isometrics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316472232.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.