Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN FIELD WELDING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SOUTHERN FIELD WELDING, LLC in 238 WEST 35 SOUTH, BURLEY, ID 83318 (NAICS 333294). OSHA activity number 330293143.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Southern Field Welding, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern Field Welding, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
238 WEST 35 SOUTH
City
BURLEY
State
ID
ZIP
83318
Mailing
238 WEST 35 SOUTH, BURLEY, ID 83318
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333294
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being pinned under, crushed, or thrown from a forklift truck.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011, and at times prior thereto, an older model with 'outbound train yard' markings, Hyster forklift, used for handling parts being sand blasted, was used without a seat belt.        (b)  Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011, and at times prior thereto, an older model, Clark forklift, used for handling parts being delivered to the Fabrication Shop, was used without a seat belt.     (c) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011, and at times prior thereto, an older model, propane powered Hyster 80 forklift, used for handling parts being sand blasted, was used without a seat belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):  Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, fabrication, welding, and assembly of MBI tanker trailers where employees are working from 4-8 feet above a concrete floor with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Aug 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblaster working for 275 minutes was exposed to an average sound level of 96.1 decibels and an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 92.1 decibels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Aug 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1):  When information indicates that any employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblaster working for 275 minutes was exposed to an average sound level of 96.1 decibels and an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 92.1 decibels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.    (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblasting room and emplyees working and wearing respiratory protection, in and around the room, where there were elevated levels of respirable silica dust.    (b) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, laborer cleaning up silica dust and wearing respiratory protection was operating the powered floor cleaner where there were elevated levels of respirable silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):  The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace and include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblasting room and emplyees working and wearing respiratory protection, in and around the room, where there were elevated levels of respirable silica dust.    (b) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, laborer cleaning up silica dust and wearing respiratory protection was operating the powered floor cleaner where there were elevated levels of respirable silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.      (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblasting room and emplyees working and wearing respiratory protection, in and around the room, where there were elevated levels of respirable silica dust.    (b) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, laborer cleaning up silica dust and wearing respiratory protection was operating the powered floor cleaner where there were elevated levels of respirable silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3):  The employee training did not include the requirements of sections (h)(3)(i)-(iv) of this paragraph.       (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblasting and employees working in the sandblasting room were not trained on the health hazards of silica dust.    (b) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, laborer cleaning up silica dust and wearing respiratory protection while operating the powered floor cleaner was not trained on the health hazards of silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):  Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.    (a)  Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, employees used compressed air nozzles to clean work surfaces and themselves without a means to reduce the pressure at the point of use.  Air pressure at the nozzle was greater than 90 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i):  All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers identified for the purpose.      (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, open electrical box linked to Vari-Speed control box, employees were exposed to live conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iii)(A):  Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.     (a) Fabrication shop; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, Sandblasting room exhaust fan mounted in the wall, was plugged in to an extension cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i):  Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket).      (a) Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, several shop extension cords had broken plugs and/or damaged insulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 D02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(ii):  Each lavatory was not provided with hot and cold running water, or tepid running water.     (a) Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, restroom was not provided hot water.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4):  The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers are maintained in a fully charged and operable condition.     (a) Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, fire extinguishers were not fully charged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2):  Portable extinguishers or hose used in lieu thereof under paragraph (d)(3) of this section were not visually inspected monthly.     (a) Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, fire extinguishers with outdated inspection tags from July 16, 2004.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3):  The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers are subjected to an annual maintenance check. The employer did not record the annual maintenance date and retain this record for one year after the last entry or the life of the shell, whichever is less.     (a) Fabrication and machine shops; on or about April 27, 2011 and at times prior thereto, where there were fire extinguishers with outdated inspection tags from July 16, 2004.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Southern Field Welding, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330293143.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.