Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: TIC, THE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TIC, THE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY in 3806 HIGHWAY 30, NEW PLYMOUTH, ID 83655 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 330294794.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TIC, the Industrial Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TIC, the Industrial Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3806 HIGHWAY 30
City
NEW PLYMOUTH
State
ID
ZIP
83655
Mailing
1550 JAMES RD., BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236210
Employees
271
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1126 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2011
Abate by
Jan 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(1):  Where a hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI), the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and did not ensure that employees use such clothing and equipment.    a)	P22 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees with protective clothing for welding on stainless steel pipe with exposures above the permissible exposure limit.    b)	P91 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide employees with protective clothing for welding on stainless steel pipe with exposures more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit.    Note:  Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.1126 G02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2011
Abate by
Jan 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(2)(i):  The employer did not ensure that employees removed all protective clothing and equipment contaminated with chromium (VI) at the end of the work shift or at the completion of their tasks involving chromium (VI) exposure.    a)	P22 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prevent employees from leaving the worksite while wearing contaminated protective clothing where they had been exposed to hexavalent chromium levels above the permissible exposure limit.    b)	P91 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prevent employees from leaving the worksite while wearing contaminated protective clothing where they had been exposed to hexavalent chromium levels more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit.    Note:  Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1126 G03 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2011
Abate by
Jan 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1926.1126(g)(3)(i):  The employer did not clean, launder, repair and replace all protective clothing and equipment required by this section as needed to maintain its effectiveness.    a)	P22 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not launder employees personal protective clothing to remove hexavalent chromium contamination where exposures were above the permissible exposure limit.    b)	P91 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not launder employees personal protective clothing to remove hexavalent chromium contamination where exposures were more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit.    Note:  Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.1126 H01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2011
Abate by
Jan 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1126(h)(1):  Where protective clothing and equipment was required, the employer did not  provide change rooms in conformance with 29 CFR 1926.51 Where skin contact with chromium (VI) occurs, the employer did not provide washing facilities in conformance with 29 CFR 1926.51.     a)	P22 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide change rooms or adequate washing facilities for employees with skin exposure to hexavalent chromium fume above the permissible exposure limit.    b)	P91 pipe welding:  On or about May 11, 2011 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide change rooms or adequate washing facilities for employees with skin exposure to hexavalent chromium fume more than 4 times the permissible exposure limit.    Note:  Abatement certification and supporting documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View TIC, the Industrial Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330294794.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.