Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERITAGE STEEL SERVICES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HERITAGE STEEL SERVICES INC. in 21000 BROOKPARK RD., CLEVELAND, OH 44212 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 330631284.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Heritage Steel Services INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Heritage Steel Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
21000 BROOKPARK RD.
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44212
Mailing
2853 WESTWAY DR., BRUNSWICK, OH 44212
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15):     Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person:    On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that 3/8 inch chokers that were supplied for fall protection were capable of supporting 5, 000 lbs.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $3300
  • — F (S) $1650
  • — Z (S) $3300

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $1,320 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1):     Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.    A:  On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection devices or systems were used when accessing and egressing from a second floor area that was 15.5 feet above the ground.        B:  On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection systems or devices when working on an unprotected deck side that was 15.3 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2640
  • — F (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $2640

1926.760 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.760(b)(1):     Each connector was not protected in accordance with paragraphe (a)(1) of this section from fall hazards of more than two stories or 30 feet (9.1 m) above a lower level, whichever is less:    On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities (connecting), the employer did not ensure employees used proper fall protection systems/devices to prevent an employee from falling 45 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $4620
  • — F (S) $2310
  • — Z (S) $4620

1926.754 E02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $1,320 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.754(e)(2)(ii):     Roof and floor holes and openings were not decked over.  Where large size, configuration or other structural design does not allow openings to be decked over (such as elevator shafts, stair wells, etc.) employees shall be protected in accordance with § 1926.760(a)(1):    A:  On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that continuous decking was in place so employees were not exposed to a deck opening that was 12 inches wide and 60 feet in length.      B:  On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that continuous decking was in place so employees were not exposed to deck openings when accessing and egressing from a third floor area that was not continuously decked.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2640
  • — F (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $2640

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $1,320 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:      On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure employees extended portable extension ladders three feet above the upper landing surface to gain access to the second and third floors of a commercial building.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2640
  • — F (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $2640

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2011
Abate by
Nov 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10):     The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder were not placed with the two rails supported equally:    On or about 05/24/11 during steel erection activities, the employer did not ensure that when employees used a portable extension ladder to gain access to a work position that it rested on the ladders side rails for support.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $3300
  • — F (S) $1650
  • — Z (S) $3300

View Heritage Steel Services INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330631284.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.