STEUBENVILLE, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: DELAGRANGE CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DELAGRANGE CONSTRUCTION in 120 S 3RD STREET, STEUBENVILLE, OH 43952 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330770231.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DELAGRANGE CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 120 S 3RD STREET
- City
- STEUBENVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43952
- Mailing
- 2176 ALAMO ROAD, CARROLLTON, OH 44615
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a)(LOCATION)(SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) a. On the site where employees were working below the roof line to pick up wood shake shingles, the employer did not provide head protection thereby exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shallbe avoided. Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage. a. On the site where an extension cord from the electrical outlet to the job trailer was used to power a rerigerator, the cord was pinched between the top of the bottom section of the door thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected fromfalling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employeeson each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs,and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part. a. On the side of Block house 1 where employees were standing on a ladder jack scaffold to install and hand up rolls of tar paper, the employer did not provide guardrails on the back of the scaffold thereby exposing employees to a 13'9" fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $4200
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On the roof of Block house 1 where employees were removing wood shake shingles and reapplying tar paper, the employer did not provide or enforce the use of a fall protection system thereby exposing employees to a 13'9" fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $4200
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a. On the site where employees removed wood shake shingles from Block House 1 and reapplied tar paper, the employer did not train employees in the hazards of working at heights which exceeded six feet thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $3000
- · F (O) $0
- · Z (S) $3000
More inspections at Delagrange Construction
View Delagrange Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330770231.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.