CENTERVILLE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO CANO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO CANO in 6785 NESTLE CREEK LANE, CENTERVILLE, OH 45458 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330923368.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTONIO CANO
- Site address
- 6785 NESTLE CREEK LANE
- City
- CENTERVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45458
- Mailing
- 8593 TOWSON BLVD., MIAMISBURG, OH 45342
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): \\r\\n\\r\\n\\\"Residential construction.\\\" Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) Workers were engaged in residential construction activities installing roofing material on an existing single family house. Workers were exposed to potential fall from a height between 14.0 and 17.2 feet in that a residential or conventional fall protecion system was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections at Antonio Cano
View Antonio Cano's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330923368.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.