OSHA Inspection: CRUZ CONSTRUCTION

Issued

Sep 20, 2011

Abate by

Nov 2, 2011

Penalty

Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Workers were observed in commercial/residential construction activities re-roofing an existing multi-story condominiums in an residential sub-division. Workers were observed exposed to potential fall hazrds and inspections of the jobsite by a competent person were not conducted.

Issued

Sep 20, 2011

Penalty

Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)      Workers were observed engaged in residential construction activities re-roofing multi-story condominium units. Workers who were exposed to potential fall hazards were not properly trained in fall protection criteria.

Issued

Sep 20, 2011

Abate by

Oct 20, 2011

Penalty

Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Workers were observed engaged in residential construction activities re-roofing existing multi-story condominium units. Workers were exposed to potential fall hazards and were not properly trained in fall protecion criteria.