WEST BEND, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: PINICAS SIDING & ROOFING, LLC
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PINICAS SIDING & ROOFING, LLC in 174 WISCONSIN STREET, WEST BEND, WI 53090 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 330980756.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PINICAS SIDING & ROOFING, LLC
- Site address
- 174 WISCONSIN STREET
- City
- WEST BEND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53090
- Mailing
- 3476 S. 14TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (J)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portableladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps,walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface shall beused. Crossbraces shall not be used as a means of access. The scaffold platform was greater then 2 feet below the roof and an employee climbed on the roof from the scaffold without sufficient means of access on to the roof exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $2000
- · F (S) $2000
- · C (S) $4200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. The ladder that employees used to access the pump jack scaffold extended below the scaffold and did not extend at least 3 feet above the access level onto the pump jack. This exposed employees to a possible fall hazard of approximately 22 feet.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $0
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work on a residential building. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet on an 8/12 pitch roof. (b) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work on a residential building. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet on an 8/12 pitch roof.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $2000
- · F (S) $2000
- · C (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work on a residential building. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet on an 8/12 pitch roof. The employer did not ensure that the employee was trained to recognize and protect themselves from fall hazards. (b) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting work on a residential building. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet on an 8/12 pitch roof. The employer did not ensure that the employee was trained to recognize and protect themselves from fall hazards.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $0
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4200
More inspections at Pinicas Siding & Roofing, LLC
View Pinicas Siding & Roofing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330980756.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.