Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: BRUNELLE BROS. ELECTRIC, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BRUNELLE BROS. ELECTRIC, INC. in 100 BRADLEY ST, MANCHESTER, NH 03103 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 330989120.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brunelle Bros. Electric, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brunelle Bros. Electric, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 BRADLEY ST
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03103
Mailing
P.O. BOX 836, BILLERICA, MA 01821
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):  The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury.    Bldg. D 3rd floor:  The employees, engaged in rough electrical work activities, such as: pulling wires and drilling holes and exposed to hazards such as flying debris, ladder and fall hazards, were not trained in the recognition and avoidance of these hazards or the applicable regulations to control them.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1650
  • · Z (S) $3300

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Bldg D:    1)  The employees, walking on the tops of the 3rd floor ceiling joists without fall protection, were not adequately trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures used to control them.    2)  The employees, accessing upper levels via the stairway at the south end of the building and exposed to falling from the unprotected doorway at its base, were not adequately trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures used to control them.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    Bldg D:  The employees, accessing the attic area via the six foot step ladder, were not adequately trained in the recognition of ladder hazards or the procedures followed to minimize them.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $2,310 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a):  Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:    Bldg. D:    1)  A proper ladder was not provided for the employees descending from the attic, where there was a break in elevation of 8.5 feet.      2)  A ladder or stairway was not provided at the point of access at the front of the building where the break in elevation was 22-inches.     3)  A ladder or stairways was not provided at the point of access at the north end of the building where the break in elevation was 30-inches.     4)  A ladder or stairways was not provided at the point of access at the south end of the building where the break in elevation was 74-inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2310
  • · Z (S) $4620

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.     Bldg. D:  The 6 foot step ladder, used by the employees to descend from the attic space, did not extend 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):  The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    Bldg. D:  Employees were using the top and top step of a 6 foot stepladder as a step to descend from the attic space.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.    Bldg. D:    1)  The employees, engaged in rough wiring work in the attic space, were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 8.5 feet to a lower level.     2)  The employees, ascending and descending the stairway at the south end of the building were exposed to falling approximately six feet two-inches from the unguarded doorway.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4620

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,920 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Bldg D, 3rd floor:      1.  Employees, engaged in drilling overhead, were not wearing eye protection.    2.  Employees, engaged in pulling electrical cable, were not wearing eye protection.    BRUNELLE BROTHERS ELECTRICAL, INC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 311829568, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 001, ISSUED ON 3 JULY, 2008, WITH RESPECT TO WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 32 & 34 LIBERTY RD, BEDFORD, MA 01730 WITH A FINAL ORDER DATE OF 07/23/2008.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $5000
  • · Z (R) $7920

1926.150 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Dec 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $660 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i):  A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof:    Bldg. D:  Fire extinguishers were not provided for employees working in the building.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $660

View Brunelle Bros. Electric, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330989120.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.