Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: Y NOT FOODS, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of Y NOT FOODS, INC in 1022 LUMBERMANS TRAILS, MADISON, WI 53716 (NAICS 311411). OSHA activity number 331079301.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Y NOT Foods, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Y NOT Foods, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
Y NOT FOODS, INC
Site address
1022 LUMBERMANS TRAILS
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53716
Mailing
1022 LUMBERMANS TRAILS, MADISON, WI 53716
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311411
Employees
26
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(3):     Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms, or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment, pickling or galvanizing tanks, degreasing units, and similar hazards were not guarded with a standard railing and toeboard.                Employees standing on an uneven platform adjacent to dangerous equipment were not protected by a standard railing and toeboard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.24 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(b):     "Where fixed stairs are required." Fixed stairs were not provided for access from one structure level to another where operations necessitate regular travel between levels, and for access to operating platforms at any equipment which requires attention routinely during operations. Fixed stairs also were not provided where access to elevations is daily or at each shift for such purposes as gauging,inspection, regular maintenance, etc., where such work may expose employees to acids, caustics, gases, or other harmful substances, or for which purposes the carrying of tools or equipment by hand is normally required. (It is not the intent of this section to preclude the use of fixed laddersfor access to elevated tanks, towers, and similar structures, overhead traveling cranes, etc., where the use of fixed ladders is common practice.)Spiral stairways shall not be permitted except for special limited usage and secondary access situations where it is not practical to provide a conventional stairway. Winding stairways may be installed on tanks and similar round structures where the diameter of the structure is not less than five (5) feet.      Fixed stairs were not provided for employees when entering onto the mixer platform and also when adjusting the control panel on the Viking.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Feb 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:              There wasn't a specific lockout/tagout procedure for the Linde line.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Feb 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):     The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a              Employees operating the Clark battery fork truck did not complete fork truck training program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Mar 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.            Employees operating the mixer were not protected from rotating parts in the mixer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Work rests. On off hand grinding machines, work rests shall be used to support the work. They shall be of rigid construction and designed to be adjustable to compensate for wheel wear. Work rests were not kept adjusted closely to the wheel with amaximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage. The work rest shall be securely clamped after each adjustment. The adjustment shall not be made with the wheel in motion.          Employee operate the bench grinder, of which, the work rest opening is greater than one-eighth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs(b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall not exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)          Employee operating the bench grinder, of which, the tongue guard on the grinder exceeded one fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1):     'Space about electric equipment. Sufficient access and working space were not provided and maintained about all electric equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment.                  Electrical panels located behind the mixer did not have sufficient access and working space around it to permit ready and safe operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2012
Abate by
Mar 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):     Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    Employee was trouble shooting 480 VAC circuits without electrical personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2900
  • · Z (S) $4900

View Y NOT Foods, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331079301.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.