DURHAM, NH —
OSHA Inspection: COTTAGE BUILDERS, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COTTAGE BUILDERS, INC in 100 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, DURHAM, NH 03824 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 331080630.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COTTAGE BUILDERS, INC
- Site address
- 100 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
- City
- DURHAM
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03824
- Mailing
- 402 OFFICE PARK DRIVE SUITE 199, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35223
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): a. Site- Employees were exposed to fall, struck by, powered industrial truck, electrical, fire, eye, ppe, housekeeping, and ladder hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall, struck by, and caught between hazards associated with the installation of inadequately braced prefabricated roof trusses: a. Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4- Employees were exposed to struck by hazards where prefabricated wood roof trusses were not adequately braced during installation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5600
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.150 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $3,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof: a. Site- Employees were not protected from fire hazards where flammable and combustible materials were used in and around wood framed structures being built onsite that did not have a fire extinguisher available.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $4000
1926.150 C01 VI
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas were being used on the jobsite: a. Site- Employees were not protected from fire hazards while filling construction equipment with diesel fuel using multiple five gallon containers where there was no fire extinguisher located within 50 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. a. Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5- Employees working from the second floors were exposed to falls of over ten feet from unprotected floor edges, wall openings, stairway openings, and window openings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5600
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site- Employees who were exposed to falls were not provided with fall protection training that included, but not limited to, anchor point selection, equipment installation, free fall distance, equipment connecting devices, and fall hazard recognition from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5600
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $4,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. Buildings 2, 3, 4, 5, 6- Employees were exposed to slip and trip hazards where the step up to the front and rear first floor entry ways were approximately 25 inches from the exterior grade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4800
- — Z (S) $6000
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: a. Buildings 1, 2, 3- Employees were exposed to slip and trip hazards where a handrail was not installed in each of the stairways going to the second floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $5000
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever was less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. Building 2- Employees were exposed to a fall hazard where the stairway did not have a stair rail system installed along the unprotected edge.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Cottage Builders, INC
View Cottage Builders, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331080630.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.