BERLIN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: LEACH FARMS INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LEACH FARMS INC in W 1102 BUTTERCUP CT, BERLIN, WI 54923 (NAICS 424480). OSHA activity number 331085571.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEACH FARMS INC
- Site address
- W 1102 BUTTERCUP CT
- City
- BERLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54923
- Mailing
- W 1102 BUTTERCUP CT, BERLIN, WI 54923
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424480
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: On or about November 2nd, 2011, the company had not conducted a workplace hazard assessment that complied with the requirements of this section to ensure employees were protected by the appropriate personal protective equipment. Abatment Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2600
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: On or about October 26th, 2011, the company did not require employee(s) cleaning near the sharp blades on the Translicer cutters to wear the appropriate glove. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- May 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $3,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) On or about October 26th, 2011 an employee attempted to clean a Translicer 2500 Cutter he was operating. The employee lifted the metal cover enclosing the point of operation. When the employee reached into the machine, he came into contact with the rotating cutting blades that were still coasting to a stop after the electrical interlock switch had been disconnected. The employee suffered amputation injuries to two fingers as a result. b) The company did not have a lockout/tagout program that met all of the requirements of this standard including, but not limited to a written program and procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid: On or about October 26th, 2011, the company did not have someone available who was trained to render first aid immediately after an employee suffered two amputation injuries, when emergency services and/or an health service facility was not immediately available. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 2, 2011, the employer had not developed and implemented in the workplace, a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous materials such as: 1. WD-40, aerosol 2. Penetrating oil 3. Bearing and belt grease All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) through (h) must be covered in a Hazard Communication program. Key elements include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Labeling, 2. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), 3. Employee information and training. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2400
1904.7 B03
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: On or about November 2, 2011, the employer did not enter correctly the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or its equivalent for the calender year 2011: Case No. 5, an employee suffering amputation injuries had multiple days away from work and was put on restrictions when the individual returned to work. The employer recorded the case as an Other Recordable Case and did not mark any days in column (K). Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $600
1904.7 B04
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: On or about November 2, 2011, the employer did not enter correctly the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or its equivalent for the calender year 2011: Case No. 5, an employee suffering amputation injuries had multiple days away from work and was put on restrictions when the individual returned to work. The employer recorded the case as an Other Recordable Case and did not mark any days in column (L). Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1904.32 A03
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(3): The employer did not certify an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent: a) On or about November 2, 2011, the employer failed to certify the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses to calendar year 2008. b) On or about November 2, 2011, the employer failed to certify the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses to calendar year 2009. c) On or about November 2, 2011, the employer failed to certify the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses to calendar year 2010. Abatement Certification and Abatement Documentation Required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $600
More inspections at Leach Farms INC
View Leach Farms INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424480)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331085571.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.