MEDINA, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: NATIONAL GRANITE LUXURIES
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NATIONAL GRANITE LUXURIES in 930 LAFAYETTE, MEDINA, OH 44256 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 331086256.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NATIONAL GRANITE LUXURIES
- Site address
- 930 LAFAYETTE
- City
- MEDINA
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44256
- Mailing
- 930 LAFAYETTE, MEDINA, OH 44256
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,530 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent: An employee working in the cutting area was exposed to continuous noise at 66.5% of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 440 minute sampling period on 11/14/2011; exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 40 minutes not sampled. Abatement Steps: 1. Effective hearing protection shall be provided and used by all exposed employees as an interim protection measure and when administrative or engineering controls fail to reduce sound levels within the levels of table G-16. In addition, an effective hearing conservation program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95(c) thru (n) shall be maintained. Abatement must be completed (5 Working Days) 2. Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and /or administrative measures to control employee exposure to noise as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. a) Evaluation of engineering control options. b) Selection of optimum control method and completion of design. c) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures. d) Testing and acceptance or modifications/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent Industrial Hygienist or other technically qualified person. Abatement must be completed (15 working days) 3. Abatement should have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Abatement must be completed (30 working days)
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1530
- · Z (S) $2550
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable; On or about November 14, 2011, the fabricator working in the granite shop was exposed to silica dust at 5.076 mg/M3 which is appoximately 3.36 times the permissable exposure limit of 1.5 mg/M3; exposure calculations included a zero increment for 40 minutes not sampled. At this time employees are being exposed to levels above the PEL and the employer shall require mandatory use of a respirator until feasible engineering controls can be put in place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2550
1910.305 G01 I
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,530 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(i): Electrical cords and cables were not approved or conditions of use and location: On or about November 3, 2011 the employer provided electrical cords that were not suitable for the wet conditions in the cutting area. A fan had an electrical cord that had exposed wires and the cord was covered in electrical tape from damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1530
- · Z (S) $2550
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee was exposed to (silica dust) in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of (1.5 mg/M3) listed in Table Z-3: On or about November 14, 2011, the fabricator working in the granite shop was exposed to silica dust at 5.076 mg/M3 which is approximately 3.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 1.5 mg/M3; exposure calculations included a zero increment for 40 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2500
- · Z (S) $3570
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): For the employee including, but not limited to, the employee whose exposure is described in Citation 1, Item 4(a). General methods of control include, but are notlimited to: 1. Install a dust control appratus on portable grinder. 2. Use an exhaust ventilation system to capture silica dust. Abatement Steps STEP 1: Effective respirators shall be provided and used by all employee(s) as an interim measure. Abatement must be completed by (5 working days). STEP 2: Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. a) Evaluation of the extent and location of the hazard source. b) Evaluation of control measure options. c) Selection of optimum control method(s). d) Determination of control measure design. e) Ordering and delivery of equipment and material(s). f) Installation of control measures. g) Training of employees in proper operation and maintenance of newly-implemented control measures. h) Assurance of effective performance of control measures. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a technically qualified person. Abatement must be completed by (15 working days). STEP 3: Correction should have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls and their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Abatement must be completed by (30 working days).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable extinguishers or hose used in lieu thereof under paragraph (d)(3) of this section shall be visually inspected monthly: On or about November 3, 2011 the employer did not do visual monthly checks on the ABC fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The items listed in subparagraphs (j)(2)(i)-(vii) were not inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, and all deficiencies were not carefully examined and a determination made as to whether they constituted a safety hazard: On or about November 3, 2011 the employer did not do daily visual inspections on the overhead cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at National Granite Luxuries
View National Granite Luxuries's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 331086256.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.