TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: AES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AES in TUMON HOLIDAY MANOR UNIT 101, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 331086744.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AES
- Site address
- TUMON HOLIDAY MANOR UNIT 101
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96913
- Mailing
- 256 CHALAN SAN ANTONIO, TAMUNING, GU 96913
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a) At the project site, head protection was not used while employees were erecting a mobile scaffold. Employees were exposed to the hazards of loose scaffold components and small hand tools striking their heads.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. At the project site at front of Unit 101, ladders or stairs were not used to access completed scaffold platforms. Employee climbed the end frame of the mobile scaffolds to access the platforms. Employee was exposed to the hazard of falling from heights that varied from about three feet to 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.452 W02
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: (a) At the project site in front of Unit 101, the mobile scaffold was accessed without locking the wheels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. At the project site, a mobile scaffold was being erected without the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in (a) At the project site fronting Tumon Holiday Manor, Unit 101, employees who were involved in erecting a mobile scaffold were not trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at AES
View AES's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331086744.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.