Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AES in TUMON HOLIDAY MANOR UNIT 101, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 331086744.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AES — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AES is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AES
Site address
TUMON HOLIDAY MANOR UNIT 101
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
256 CHALAN SAN ANTONIO, TAMUNING, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    (a) At the project site, head protection was not used while employees were erecting a mobile scaffold. Employees were exposed to the hazards of loose scaffold components and small hand tools striking their heads.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    At the project site at front of Unit 101, ladders or stairs were not used to access completed scaffold platforms.  Employee climbed the end frame of the mobile scaffolds to access the platforms. Employee was exposed to the hazard of falling from heights that varied from about three feet to 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:    (a) At the project site in front of Unit 101, the mobile scaffold was accessed without locking the wheels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    At the project site, a mobile scaffold was being erected without the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2012
Abate by
Apr 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in    (a) At the project site fronting Tumon Holiday Manor, Unit 101, employees who were involved in erecting a mobile scaffold were not trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View AES's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331086744.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.