Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PACIFIC EXPEDITION YACHTS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PACIFIC EXPEDITION YACHTS LLC in #3 HANGER WAY, ASTORIA, OR 97103 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 331088278.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pacific Expedition Yachts LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pacific Expedition Yachts LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
#3 HANGER WAY
City
ASTORIA
State
OR
ZIP
97103
Mailing
300 RAILROAD WAY, ASTORIA, OR 97103
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 H07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.106(h)(7)(i)(b):     Class I liquids were dispensed into containers without electrically interconnecting the nozzle and container:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury such as burns from the process of pouring acetone between 55 gallon drums and plastic work buckets without insuring that the nozzle and container were electrically connected. Located inside the tent on the northwest side of the building at #3 Hangar Way in Astoria, OR.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1):     Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from the use of a table saw for ripping and crosscuts when the table saw did not have a hood guard. The Delta Industrial table saw was located in the workshop by the the northwest wall, near the entrance doorway to the wood room.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2):     Handfed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from the use of a table saw without a spreader to rip wood. The Delta Industrial table saw was located in the workshop by the northwest wall, near the entrance doorway to the wood room.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3):     Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from the use of a table saw without anti-kickback fingers to rip wood. The Delta Industrial table saw was located in the workshop by the northwest wall, near the entrance doorway to the wood room.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 M01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.213(m)(1):     Cutting heads of hand fed panel raiser(s) were not enclosed with a cage or adjustable guard so designed so as to keep the operator's hand away from the cutting edge:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from the use of a router that was not properly guarded. The router was located in the wood room at the northwest side of the building at #3 Hangar Way in Astoria, OR.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.242(b):     Effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment was not used when compressed air was used for cleaning purposes:    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from the used of compressed air for cleaning purposes without effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment. An employee was observed cleaning their clothing with a compressed air nozzle. Located by the air compressor by the northwest wall of the workshop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1915.71 K02

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
29 CFR 1915.71(k)(2):     Ramps and stairways were not provided with 36-inch handrails with midrails.    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from a fall to a lower level due to staircases that did not have railings or that only had a railing on one of the open sides and did not have midrails. Multiple staircases located throughout the workshop at #3 Hangar Way in Astoria, OR.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3600

1915.73 D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1915.73(d):     When employees were exposed to unguarded edges of decks, platforms, flats, or similar flat surfaces, more than 5 feet above a solid surface, the edges were not guarded by adequate guardrails meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1915.71(j)(1) and (2).    (a) Employees were potentially exposed to serious injury from a fall to a lower level due to the unguarded edges of decks and platforms. Located throughout the workshop at #3 Hangar Way in Astoria, OR.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.106 E02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iii):     Drainage or other means to control spills was not provided in areas where flammable or combustible liquids were transferred from one tank or container to another container:    (a) The inspection revealed a 55-gallon drum used to store used acetone that did not have a spill containment system. The drum was located by the northwest wall of the workshop near the tent at #3 Hangar Way in Astoria, OR.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B07 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i):     Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:    (a) The inspection revealed unused openings in a junction box and an outlet that were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment. The junction box was located in the west corner of the workshop and the outlet box was located on the southwest side of the workshop to the right of the black door leading into a storage room.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.304 G05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5):     The paths to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures were not permanent, continuous, and effective:    (a) The inspection revealed the flexible cord of the Power Max Electrical Company fan, #6H96 that was missing the grounding pin. The fan was being used inside the tent on the northwest side of the workshop at the time of the inspection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2012
Abate by
Feb 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i):     Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):    (a) The inspection revealed an extension cord with damaged outer insulation. The cord plugged into the outlet on the southwest wall of the workshop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Pacific Expedition Yachts LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331088278.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.