Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ABCO CONTRACTING, INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ABCO CONTRACTING, INC in 1ST AVE AND DOWNING ST., DENVER, CO 80218 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 331089615.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Abco Contracting, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Abco Contracting, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1ST AVE AND DOWNING ST.
City
DENVER
State
CO
ZIP
80218
Mailing
2180 E. 74TH PLACE, DENVER, CO 80229
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Dec 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the fall protection system utilized incompatible components:     (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer equipped employees with flexible, elastic-style, energy absorbing 60 inch lanyards to be used in conjunction with Protecta Rebel Self-Retracting Lifelines (SRL). The Rebel SRL was also equipped with a 24 inch energy absorbing pack. The use of a lanyard in conjuction with the Rebel SRL is not approved by the manufacturer. This condition exposed employees to a fall hazard ranging from 12-14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1926.502 D08

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8): Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two:    (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not ensure that the horizontal lifeline system, which was composed of a continuous strand of 1/2 inch cable and connected to type 7 safety barriers, was designed and maintained by a qualified person. This condition exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12-14ft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1071
  • — Z (S) $1785

1926.503 A02 III

Other-than-serious 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of personal fall arrest systems:    (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not ensure that employees equipped with Rebel Protecta Self-Retracting Lifelines (SRL), were provided training related to use of personal fall arresting systems in that employees were also equipped with flexible, elastic-style, energy absorbing lanyards. This condition exposed employees to a fall hazard ranging from 12-14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.52 D01

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Dec 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of this paragraph, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered:     (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, employees were exposed to sound levels in excess of the referenced levels on Table D-2 of the same paragraph. Employee 1 performed bridge deck demolition and was exposed to a dose of 245.8% or 96.4 dBA. This condition exposes employees to permanent hearing damage.    (b) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, employees were exposed to sound levels in excess of the referenced levels on Table D-2 of the same paragraph. Employee 2 performed bridge deck demolition and was exposed to a dose of 147.4% or 92.7 dBA. This condition exposes employees to permanent hearing damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1926.302 B04

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.302(b)(4): Effective chip guarding was not provided for the protection of employees cleaning with compressed air:                                                                (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not ensure that the fabricated pipes, which were used as blow pipes to clean the bridge deck, were equipped with chip guards. The ? inch pipe was measured at 60 inches long. This condition exposed employees to flying debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section, was not established and implemented where respirator(s) were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirator(s) were required by the employer:      (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not establish and implement a respiratory protection program. Employees were required to wear 3M 3205 N95 filtering face pieces while conducting demolition work on a bridge deck. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.     29 CFR 1926.103: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.134 of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify or evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:     (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards associated with bridge deck repair which included concrete demolition. Employees were required to wear 3M 3205 N95 filtering face pieces while conducting demolition work on a bridge deck. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.     29 CFR 1926.103: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.134 of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace:     (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not provide medical evaluations prior to their use of a respirator. Employees were required to wear 3M 3205 N95 filtering face pieces while conducting demolition work on a bridge deck. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.     29 CFR 1926.103: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.134 of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used:    (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not ensure that fit tests were provided to employees prior to their use of a respirator. Employees were required to wear 3M 3205 N95 filtering face pieces while conducting demolition work on a bridge deck. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.     29 CFR 1926.103: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.134 of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2011
Abate by
Feb 3, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide training prior to requiring employees to use respirators in the workplace:     (a) ABCO Contracting, Inc. @ 1st Avenue and Downing Street, Denver, CO 80218: On and before 11/10/11, the employer did not ensure that respirator training was provided to employees prior to their use of a respirator. Employees were required to wear 3M 3205 N95 filtering face pieces while conducting demolition work on a bridge deck. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.     29 CFR 1926.103: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.134 of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Abco Contracting, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331089615.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.