Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LISANDRO LUCAS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LISANDRO LUCAS in 1011 & 1045 LYNDALE, APPLETON, WI 54914 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331090530.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lisandro Lucas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lisandro Lucas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LISANDRO LUCAS
Site address
1011 & 1045 LYNDALE
City
APPLETON
State
WI
ZIP
54914
Mailing
4110 GERALDINE AVE APT #7, SAINT ANN, MO 63074
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2):     The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection.    Employees were not provided with sufficient personal fall arrest systems or equipment to perform work at heights.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4620

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $3,300
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii):     Persponal Fall Arrest Systems were not rigged so that an employee could neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level;    Two Employees using Personal Fall Arrest Systems had enough slack in their lifelines to allow them to fall more than 6' or to hit the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3300

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Employees are not trained to recognize the need for fall protection or how to use properly Personal Fall Arrest Systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4620

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards:    Employees were carrying bundles of shingles up the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22):     Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause them to lose balance and fall:    Employees were carrying bundles of shingles from the ground to the roof while climbing a ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4620

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,600 · Current $6,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Employees performing re-roofing work were not wearing safety glasses.    Lisandro Lucas was cited previously for violations of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard or and equivalent Standard contained in OSHA Inspection #313138463, Citation #1, Item #2, and was affirmed as a Final Order on 06/14/11 with respect to a workplace located at 4557 Stonewood Dr, Middleton, WI 53562.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $6600

1926.501 B11

Repeat Gravity 10 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2012
Abate by
Mar 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $9,240 · Current $9,240
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):     Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    Employees working on both buildings were not protected from falls by guardrails or complete personal fall arrest systems.    Lisandro Lucas was cited previously for a violation of this Occupationa Safety and Health Standard or an equivalent Standard contained in OSHA Inspection #313138463, Citation #1, Item #4, and affirmed as a Final Order on 06/14/11, with respect to a workplace located at 4557 Stonewood Dr. Middleton, WI 53562.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $9240

View Lisandro Lucas's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331090530.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.