APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: LISANDRO LUCAS
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LISANDRO LUCAS in 1011 & 1045 LYNDALE, APPLETON, WI 54914 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331090530.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LISANDRO LUCAS
- Site address
- 1011 & 1045 LYNDALE
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54914
- Mailing
- 4110 GERALDINE AVE APT #7, SAINT ANN, MO 63074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection. Employees were not provided with sufficient personal fall arrest systems or equipment to perform work at heights.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4620
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,300 · Current $3,300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Persponal Fall Arrest Systems were not rigged so that an employee could neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level; Two Employees using Personal Fall Arrest Systems had enough slack in their lifelines to allow them to fall more than 6' or to hit the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3300
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees are not trained to recognize the need for fall protection or how to use properly Personal Fall Arrest Systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4620
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards: Employees were carrying bundles of shingles up the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,620 · Current $4,620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause them to lose balance and fall: Employees were carrying bundles of shingles from the ground to the roof while climbing a ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4620
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $6,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Employees performing re-roofing work were not wearing safety glasses. Lisandro Lucas was cited previously for violations of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard or and equivalent Standard contained in OSHA Inspection #313138463, Citation #1, Item #2, and was affirmed as a Final Order on 06/14/11 with respect to a workplace located at 4557 Stonewood Dr, Middleton, WI 53562.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $6600
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $9,240 · Current $9,240
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Employees working on both buildings were not protected from falls by guardrails or complete personal fall arrest systems. Lisandro Lucas was cited previously for a violation of this Occupationa Safety and Health Standard or an equivalent Standard contained in OSHA Inspection #313138463, Citation #1, Item #4, and affirmed as a Final Order on 06/14/11, with respect to a workplace located at 4557 Stonewood Dr. Middleton, WI 53562.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $9240
More inspections at Lisandro Lucas
View Lisandro Lucas's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331090530.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.